Oregon 2023 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3632

Introduced
6/20/23  
Refer
6/20/23  
Report Pass
6/22/23  
Engrossed
6/23/23  
Report Pass
6/24/23  
Enrolled
6/25/23  
Passed
7/13/23  
Chaptered
7/24/23  

Caption

Relating to statute of limitations.

Impact

The implementation of HB 3632 would bring changes to the time frames governing various civil actions, making it essential for individuals and legal practitioners to adapt to the new regulations. This could potentially affect a wide range of civil claims, from personal injury lawsuits to contract disputes. By establishing clearer limits, the bill aims to improve the predictability and fairness of the judicial process, though it may also create new challenges for those who may find themselves needing to file claims. The reception of these changes will depend heavily on how they align with the experiences of potential plaintiffs navigating the legal system.

Summary

House Bill 3632 focuses on the statute of limitations for civil actions, aiming to adjust the time limits within which legal claims must be filed. This legislation is particularly significant as it seeks to streamline the legal processes associated with civil lawsuits, ensuring that timely justice is served while also addressing issues related to access to the courts. Advocates believe that a more clearly defined statute of limitations can help reduce the backlog in civil cases and facilitate a more efficient judicial system.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 3632 appears to be cautiously optimistic, with many recognizing the benefits of a clearer statute of limitations but also expressing concerns about how these changes will influence the ability of individuals to seek redress. Supporters argue that such reforms are necessary for a modern legal system, while critics warn that stricter time limits could inadvertently disadvantage claimants who may face barriers in initiating their lawsuits in a timely manner. This duality encapsulates the prevailing mixed opinions on the necessity and implications of the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 3632 include debates over the adequacy of the proposed time limits and concerns about access to justice. Critics argue that certain groups, especially those who may be less familiar with legal processes or who experience delays in realizing their need for legal action, could be adversely impacted by the new statute of limitations. Furthermore, there are worries that the changes might benefit larger entities that may possess better resources to navigate the legal system efficiently compared to individuals or smaller plaintiffs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

OR SB986

Relating to statute of limitations.

OR HB2302

Relating to the statute of limitations for certain crimes.

OR HB3345

Relating to statute of limitations; declaring an emergency.

OR HB3581

Relating to sex crime statutes of limitation; prescribing an effective date.

OR SB1078

Relating to official misconduct.

OR SB974

Relating to sexual assault; and declaring an emergency.

OR HB3369

Relating to sex crimes involving controlled substances; declaring an emergency.

OR SB831

Modifies provisions relating to statutes of limitations

OR SB640

Relating to crime victims who are under 18 years of age.

OR HB491

Relating to the statute of limitations for aggravated assault.

Similar Bills

WV HB2784

Relating to duty to prosecute

IN SB0165

Noncompliant prosecutor.

IN SB0148

Prosecuting attorneys.

IN SB0284

Prosecuting attorneys.

IN HB1371

Additional prosecuting attorneys.

IN HB1215

Miami County deputy prosecuting attorney.

IN HB1217

Prosecuting attorneys.

NJ A4157

Establishes Inmate Prosecution Unit in DLPS.