The passage of HB 973 would significantly alter existing state laws on abortion by imposing stricter requirements on medical professionals who provide abortion services. Under this bill, a qualified provider must first conduct an ultrasound, determine the gestational age of the fetus, and provide the woman with specific information regarding the ultrasound results before proceeding with the abortion. This structure is designed to ensure that women are fully informed, although it may add logistical challenges for both providers and women seeking these services.
Summary
House Bill 973, titled 'Health - Abortion - Ultrasound and Waiting Period', introduces new regulations regarding the circumstances under which a qualified provider may perform or induce an abortion. Central to the bill is the establishment of a mandatory waiting period after a woman receives transabdominal ultrasound imaging. Specifically, the bill prohibits abortion procedures within 24 hours following ultrasound imaging, and introduces additional constraints for women residing 100 miles or more from the facility performing the abortion.
Contention
Points of contention surrounding HB 973 primarily revolve around its implications for women's access to abortion services. Proponents assert that mandatory ultrasound requirements ensure informed decision-making and may even have the potential to alter women's choices regarding abortion. Critics, however, argue that these requirements serve as unnecessary barriers to care, particularly impacting women in rural areas who may already face difficulties in accessing abortion providers due to distance. This divide reflects broader national debates on reproductive rights and women's healthcare autonomy.
Requires that notice and election form be provided to, the fetal heartbeat be made audible to, and ultrasound images be displayed for review by, a pregnant woman prior to an abortion. (8/1/12)