Texas House Bill HJR138

Texas 2019 - 86th Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment regarding limits on the rate of growth of spending by the state and certain political subdivisions of the state.

Impact

The amendments introduced by HJR138 would directly impact state financial management practices and those of local political subdivisions. It mandates that each political subdivision, unless exempt, adhere to growth rate limitations for total expenditures. The implementation of such measures is intended to provide more predictability regarding budget planning for state and local governments, fostering an environment that could prevent overspending during economic downturns. Furthermore, the bill includes provisions for emergency spending beyond these limits if a majority of the respective legislative body votes for it, adding a layer of flexibility during critical times.

Summary

HJR138 proposes a constitutional amendment to limit the rate of growth of spending by the state and certain political subdivisions. The amendment targets appropriations from state tax revenues that are not constitutionally dedicated. Specifically, it stipulates that the growth rate of these appropriations must not exceed the estimated rate of population growth in Texas, adjusted for inflation. This framework aims to encourage fiscal responsibility and ensure that government spending remains proportional to the state's population increases and economic conditions.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HJR138 relate to its potential limitations on local governance and the ability of municipalities to respond to specific fiscal needs. Critics argue that strict spending caps could hinder local governments from addressing urgent community issues, such as public safety and infrastructure improvements. Debate may arise over the perceived balance between fiscal constraints and the autonomy of local authorities, with some asserting that tighter state controls diminish local responsiveness. The discussion will likely delve into whether the amendment achieves a necessary fiscal frame without imposing too much restriction on community decision-making.