Applying to the Congress of the United States to call a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution for the limited purpose of proposing an amendment to the constitution to limit the number of justices of the United States Supreme Court to nine.
The passage of HJR45 would invoke a constitutional process that has rarely been employed, potentially leading to a significant shift in future judicial appointments and the overall structure of the Supreme Court. By limiting the court to nine justices, the amendment would aim to stabilize the judiciary and prevent what some legislators view as an excessive number of justices that could result in an unbalanced court. This resolution signals a broader national debate about judicial power and reform that resonates beyond Texas, inviting other states to consider similar measures.
In its resolution, the Texas Legislature indicates that this application will remain active unless rescinded by a future legislature, which could create ongoing political discourse surrounding the matter. Additionally, the resolution calls for the Texas Secretary of State to disseminate copies to relevant federal and state officials, emphasizing the intent to garner broader support for the proposed amendment among other states. This comprehensive approach highlights Texas's role as a leader in pushing for significant constitutional changes regarding the judiciary.
HJR45 is a joint resolution from the Texas Legislature that applies to Congress for a convention under Article V of the United States Constitution. The primary aim of this resolution is to propose an amendment to the Constitution specifically to limit the number of justices on the United States Supreme Court to nine. This legislative action reflects a growing concern among certain political factions regarding the court's composition and its implications for judicial decisions in a variety of critical areas, including but not limited to civil rights, healthcare, and election laws.
Notable points of contention surrounding HJR45 include concerns regarding state versus federal powers, as well as the implications of changing the Supreme Court's structure. Critics argue that limiting the number of justices could politicize the judicial selection process further and hinder the court's ability to operate effectively. Legislators and advocacy groups on both sides of the aisle raise alarms about the potential for creating partisan divides in judicial rulings, leading to an erosion of public trust in the courts.