Virginia 2025 Regular Session

Virginia Senate Bill SB1327

Introduced
1/12/25  
Refer
1/12/25  
Report Pass
1/22/25  
Report Pass
1/28/25  
Engrossed
1/30/25  
Refer
2/3/25  
Report Pass
2/5/25  
Engrossed
2/10/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Engrossed
2/19/25  
Enrolled
3/7/25  
Chaptered
3/24/25  

Caption

Judges; maximum number in each judicial district.

Impact

The passage of SB1327 is expected to have a significant impact on how judges are distributed and managed within each judicial district. This restructuring aims to align the number of judges with the needs of the judicial workload in each area. By specifying the maximum number of judges, the bill potentially facilitates better resource management within the court system, enhancing access to justice for residents and ensuring that judges can adequately address case demands without overburdening the judicial process.

Summary

Senate Bill 1327 addresses the structure of the judicial system in Virginia by amending existing statutes to define the maximum number of judges within various judicial districts. This bill outlines specific allocations of judges for general district courts and juvenile and domestic relations district courts across the state's districts. By clarifying these numbers, the bill aims to improve the efficiency of judicial functions, ensuring that courts can adequately manage caseloads while maintaining the necessary legal oversight in their communities.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB1327 seems to be primarily supportive, as enhancing the functionality of the judiciary is typically a collective goal among lawmakers. However, it is crucial to note that discussions may reveal varying perspectives on the adequacy of the proposed judge allocations and whether they further the overarching goal of judicial efficiency and public access to legal resources. Therefore, while support is present, opinions on the effectiveness of the measures proposed could vary among stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding whether the specified maximum numbers of judges sufficiently meet the needs of each district. Critics might argue that some areas could require more judicial resources based on their specific circumstances, such as population density and caseload trends. Therefore, while SB1327 aims to provide a structured approach to judiciary management, ongoing discussions could focus on whether it adequately captures the diverse needs across Virginia's judicial landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

VA HB1123

Judges; maximum number of authorized judgeships in each judicial district.

VA HB1412

Judges; maximum number in each judicial district.

VA SB816

Judges; maximum number in each judicial district.

VA HB717

Judges; maximum number in each judicial district.

VA SB686

Judges; maximum number in each judicial district.

VA HB310

Judges; maximum number each judicial district and circuit.

VA SB710

Judges; maximum number each judicial district and circuit.

VA HB154

Judges; maximum number in Ninth Judicial Circuit.

VA HJR427

Judges; election in circuit court, general district court, etc.

VA HJR558

Judges; election of a justice and various judges.

Similar Bills

AR SB425

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

AR HB1238

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation Funding Amounts; And To Declare An Emergency.

NH HB50

Apportioning state representative districts.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1719

Housing: Community College Faculty and Employee Housing Act of 2022.

MS HB1311

Seventh Circuit Court District; revise number of assistant district attorneys and criminal investigators.