Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1067

Filed
2/3/25  
Out of Senate Committee
4/7/25  
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to prohibiting public institutions of higher education and employees of public institutions of higher education and their spouses from soliciting or accepting gifts, grants, donations, or investments from certain foreign entities.

Impact

The bill, if enacted, would amend Texas's Education Code to include stringent measures regarding acceptable financial relationships between public higher education institutions and foreign entities. It would require institutions to incorporate prohibitions against such practices in employment contracts, thereby formalizing the expectations for employees and reinforcing accountability. Additionally, funds or valuable items accepted in violation of this statute must be returned to the issuing entity, ensuring compliance and maintaining institutional integrity.

Summary

SB1067 aims to prevent public institutions of higher education, including their employees and spouses, from soliciting or accepting gifts, grants, donations, or investments from certain foreign entities identified as posing a risk to national security. This legislation is framed around safeguarding the integrity of academic institutions and countering potential undue foreign influence in educational realms. By establishing a prohibition specifically against designated countries, as identified by national intelligence assessments, the bill seeks to ensure a robust barrier against foreign entities trying to exert influence through financial means.

Sentiment

Discussion around SB1067 has garnered a mixture of support and skepticism. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary for preserving the national security interests and ensuring that educational institutions remain free from external manipulations or influences that could undermine their missions. Conversely, detractors have expressed concerns over the broader implications for academic freedom and the potential stifling of legitimate partnerships and collaborations with international entities. The ongoing dialogue reflects an inherent tension between national security and the principles of academic openness and engagement.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the definitions of 'designated countries' and the implications of such broad prohibitions on institutional partnerships that may inadvertently hinder beneficial educational and cultural exchanges. Critics argue that while the intent is to protect national security, the implementation could have unintended consequences that limit innovation and collaborative research that often involve international stakeholders. The balance between security and the academic culture of openness continues to be a salient topic in discussions surrounding this legislation.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Education Code

  • Chapter 51. Provisions Generally Applicable To Higher Education
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB2760

Relating to the disclosure of certain gifts, grants, contracts, and financial interests received from a foreign source by certain state agencies, public institutions of higher education, and state contractors, and to the approval and monitoring of employment-related foreign travel and activities by certain public institution of higher education employees; providing civil and administrative penalties.

TX SB2459

Relating to the disclosure of certain gifts, grants, contracts, and financial interests received from a foreign source by certain state agencies, public institutions of higher education, and state contractors, and to the approval and monitoring of employment-related foreign travel and activities by certain public institution of higher education employees; providing civil and administrative penalties.

TX SB1517

Relating to prohibiting certain academic boycotts of foreign countries by public institutions of higher education.

TX SB18

Relating to the tenure and employment of faculty members at certain public institutions of higher education.

TX SB17

Relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives at public institutions of higher education.

TX HB3164

Relating to the prohibition of diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and employees at public institutions of higher education.

TX HB5126

Relating to requiring public institutions of higher education to publish certain online resources.

TX SB2519

Relating to requiring public institutions of higher education to publish certain online resources.

TX HB2724

Relating to prohibiting a public institution of higher education from partnering with certain private entities for the construction of a student housing facility.

TX SB16

Relating to the purpose of public institutions of higher education and a prohibition on compelling students enrolled at those institutions to adopt certain beliefs.

Similar Bills

CA AB850

Institutional Debt Transparency Act.

TX SB174

Relating to accountability of institutions of higher education, including educator preparation programs, and online institution resumes for public institutions of higher education.

CA AB1344

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Act of 2009.

NJ S3566

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A3422

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

NJ A5181

Revises calculation of student financial need and provides circumstances for reduction of financial aid at institutions of higher education and proprietary institutions.

CA AB70

Private postsecondary education: California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009.

CA AB3167

California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009: highly qualified private nonprofit institution.