Texas House Bill HB1766

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to exempting prepaid wireless telecommunications devices from the 9-1-1 emergency service fee.

Impact

The exemption of prepaid wireless devices from the 9-1-1 emergency service fee is expected to have significant implications on state laws related to telecommunications and public safety funding. Previously, all wireless users contributed to emergency service funding through fees integrated into their service charges. By exempting prepaid services, there may be concerns about reduced funding for emergency response services as these fees help subsidize the network that supports 9-1-1 calls. Out of concern for public safety, there will likely be discussions on how to maintain robust funding for emergency services while accommodating the financial realities of users reliant on prepaid communications.

Summary

House Bill 1766 aims to exempt prepaid wireless telecommunications devices from the 9-1-1 emergency service fee imposed by the state. This exemption targets mobile phones, services, or SIM cards that facilitate wireless communication without requiring the customer to open a credit account. By classifying these devices as exempt, the bill seeks to alleviate financial burdens on consumers who utilize prepaid services, which are often targeted towards low-income individuals who may not have access to traditional telecommunications services.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1766 may include debates over the long-term implications of reduced funding for emergency services, and whether such an exemption might encourage more consumers to opt for prepaid services without considering its consequences. Additionally, stakeholders in the telecommunications industry may express differing views on the fairness of the fee exemption, as traditional service providers might argue it leads to an unequal distribution of financial responsibilities for funding emergency services. Ultimately, there could be significant discussions regarding the balance between consumer protection and maintaining adequate resources for public safety.