Illinois House Bill HB3290

Illinois 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/25
• Refer: 2/18/25
• Refer: 3/11/25
• Report Pass: 3/20/25
• Engrossed: 4/9/25
• Refer: 4/14/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/1/25

Caption

EPA-UST FUND-DEDUCTIBLES

Impact

If enacted, HB 3290 would primarily impact operators of underground storage tanks, making it easier for them to access funds for corrective actions after a confirmed release of hazardous substances. It establishes a framework of deductibles for costs incurred, with a sliding scale that varies based on the registration dates of the tanks involved, which reflects a more tailored approach to managing financial responsibilities. The implications of this bill may extend to encouraging better compliance among tank operators, as access to financial assistance may prompt more proactive measures to prevent leaks and ensure safety.

Summary

House Bill 3290 focuses on modifying the funding mechanisms available for corrective actions related to underground storage tanks and the environmental implications of such releases. It seeks to amend provisions in the Environmental Protection Act regarding the eligibility for accessing the Underground Storage Tank Fund. The changes outlined in the bill introduce different levels of deductibles based on when the tanks were installed and the nature of the release. This legislative effort reflects an ongoing commitment to managing environmental risks associated with petroleum contamination while providing financial support for remediation efforts.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 3290 appears to be supportive, particularly among stakeholders concerned with environmental safety and economic feasibility for operators. The proposed financial structures, while designed to safeguard public health and the environment, have garnered appreciation from entities focused on ensuring that operators can mitigate leaks effectively without being deterred by excessive costs related to remediation. However, there may be concerns among some advocates about the adequacy of the funding mechanism and whether the deductibles could still place a burden on smaller operators.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about the adequacy of financial thresholds established within the bill, as some stakeholders argue that the proposed deductibles may still present a challenge to smaller entities facing potential leaks. The focus on defining corrective action and the extent of indemnification provided by the state also raises questions regarding potential limitations on accountability for more extensive environmental damage. This bill reflects an attempt to balance the operational needs of tank owners with the imperative of environmental protection, which will continue to be a focal point in legislative discussions.