California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB301

Introduced
2/10/25  
Refer
2/19/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Refer
6/17/25  

Caption

County Employees Retirement Law of 1937: employees.

Impact

The bill emphasizes that the changes made are of statewide importance rather than local matters, asserting that all cities, counties, and charter cities must adhere to the new provisions. By preventing counties from implementing discriminatory exclusions in retirement systems, the bill aims to provide a more standardized approach to public employee retirement benefits, promoting fairness in treatment for employees across different jurisdictions.

Summary

Senate Bill 301, introduced by Senator Grayson, relates to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL) and addresses membership criteria in county employee retirement systems. Effective January 1, 2026, the bill prohibits counties or districts from excluding any employee, group, or classification from membership in the retirement system, with specific exceptions for certain temporary or part-time employees as defined by existing law. This change is aimed at ensuring uniform and equitable retirement benefits for public employees across all counties and cities in California.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB 301 appears to be generally supportive, especially among advocates for public employees' rights. Proponents argue that by removing exclusionary practices, the bill enhances the benefits available to a larger workforce and addresses inequalities within employee groups. However, there may be concerns among local governments regarding the implications for managing retirement systems based on local conditions and needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around SB 301 may revolve around the balance between state-level mandates and local control over employee benefits. Critics might argue that the bill undermines the ability of local governments to tailor retirement plans to their specific workforce needs. Furthermore, questions could arise regarding the fiscal implications of expanding membership in retirement systems, particularly in terms of funding and resource allocation for existing plans.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1020

County Employees Retirement Law of 1937: disability retirement: medical conditions: employment-related presumption.

CA AB2284

County employees’ retirement: compensation.

CA SB1189

County Employees Retirement Law of 1937: county board of retirement.

CA AB2474

Retirement: County Employees Retirement Law of 1937: benefit payments and overpayments.

CA AB3025

County employees’ retirement: disallowed compensation: benefit adjustments.

CA SB885

Public employees’ retirement.

CA SB548

Public employees’ retirement: joint county and trial court contracts.

CA SB1379

Public Employees’ Retirement Law: reinstatement: County of Solano.

CA AB2770

Public employees’ retirement.

CA AB636

Employers: agricultural employees: required disclosures.

Similar Bills

CA SB37

Attorneys: unlawful solicitations and advertisements.

CA AB2998

Teachers: defined contribution plans: salaries.

CA AB237

Public employment: unfair practices: health protection.

CA AB3099

Department of Justice: law enforcement assistance with tribal issues: study.

CA ACA25

State of emergency: remote legislative proceedings.

CA AB446

Surveillance pricing.

CA AB3250

Civil law: civil rights.

CA AB1694

Foster care payments: income.