California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB576

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Report Pass
4/28/25  
Report Pass
4/28/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
6/5/25  

Caption

Video streaming services: commercial advertisements.

Impact

The enactment of SB 576 would align California law with federal guidelines laid out under the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation (CALM) Act, which seeks to enforce audio consistency across various broadcasting media. By applying similar standards to streaming services, the bill promotes a more consumer-friendly environment, fostering fair competition among different media channels. This regulation could compel streaming services to adjust their operational protocols, potentially leading to broader implications for advertising practices within the digital media landscape.

Summary

Senate Bill 576, introduced by Senator Umberg, aims to regulate the audio levels of commercial advertisements emitted by video streaming services in California. Starting July 1, 2026, the bill mandates that any video streaming service operating within the state must ensure that the audio of any commercial advertisements does not exceed the volume of the accompanying video content. This is aligned with existing federal regulations established by the FCC to prevent abrupt volume changes between programming and advertisements, thereby enhancing the viewing experience for consumers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 576 appears supportive, particularly from consumer advocacy groups who argue that loud commercials disrupt viewer enjoyment and can be particularly irritating. Legislators advocating for the bill highlight that it addresses a common complaint among consumers, thus reinforcing a commitment to consumer protection. However, there may also be concerns from video streaming companies regarding the implications on their advertising strategies, which could lead to debates over the practicality and enforcement of such regulations.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, some contention may arise regarding the vague definitions of what constitutes a video streaming service and how the bill differentiates between various types of media providers. As it stands, the bill explicitly excludes traditional television broadcasters and cable operators, raising discussions about fairness and uniformity in regulation across all advertising platforms. The potential for diverse interpretations of volume compliance standards could also lead to practical challenges for enforcement, prompting questions about the effectiveness of the proposed legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2839

Elections: deceptive media in advertisements.

CA SB1524

Consumers Legal Remedies Act: advertisements: restaurant, bar, and other food services.

CA AB2355

Political Reform Act of 1974: political advertisements: artificial intelligence.

CA SB478

Consumers Legal Remedies Act: advertisements.

CA AB1826

Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2024.

CA AB41

Telecommunications: The Digital Equity in Video Franchising Act of 2023.

CA AB1394

Commercial sexual exploitation: child sexual abuse material: civil actions.

CA AB2655

Defending Democracy from Deepfake Deception Act of 2024.

CA SB1482

Commercial financing.

CA SB970

Artificial intelligence technology.

Similar Bills

US SB1127

CALM Modernization Act of 2023 Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Modernization Act of 2023

US HB2422

CALM Modernization Act of 2023 Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Modernization Act of 2023

AZ SB1179

Video service; boundary change; definition

CT SB00278

An Act Concerning A Study Of Community Access Programming Operations.

CT SB00176

An Act Concerning Establishment Of A Fee Paid By Multichannel Video Programming Distributors To Companies Or Organizations Responsible For Community Access Programming.

KY HB610

AN ACT relating to revenue.

NC H714

NC Junk Fee Prevention Act

NC H955

NC Junk Fee Prevention Act