California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1332

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/21/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Refer
5/29/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/1/25  
Refer
7/1/25  
Report Pass
7/7/25  
Refer
7/7/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  

Caption

Medicinal cannabis: shipments.

Impact

By changing the regulations on how medicinal cannabis can be distributed, AB 1332 seeks to improve state laws regarding patient access to necessary treatments. The bill prohibits local jurisdictions from implementing regulations that could limit the delivery of medicinal cannabis via licensed microbusinesses. This centralizes and simplifies the process for qualified patients, ensuring they have better access to treatments prescribed by their healthcare providers. However, it also puts a focus on the responsibilities of these businesses, requiring proper verification and certification processes to prevent misuse.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1332, introduced by Assembly Member Ahrens, focuses on improving access to medicinal cannabis for patients in California. The bill amends existing laws to allow licensed microbusinesses to ship certain medicinal cannabis products directly to patients when such products are not readily available within a 60-mile radius. This aims to address the access crisis for seriously ill patients who require specialized cannabis products, which are often not stocked by local retailers due to low demand. The bill is designed to ensure that those who have valid physician recommendations can obtain the cannabis needed for their treatment.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1332 appears to be largely positive among proponents who argue that it directly addresses a pressing need within the community of medicinal cannabis patients. Supporters emphasize the importance of ensuring that seriously ill individuals do not face barriers in accessing the products that are crucial for managing their health conditions. However, opponents may voice concerns regarding the potential for overreach by state regulations into local governance, questioning whether this could diminish local communities’ ability to regulate cannabis sales as they see fit.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the operational implications for local governments and traditional dispensaries. There are fears that the ability of microbusinesses to ship directly to patients may undermine existing local dispensaries or lead to complications in ensuring product safety and appropriate distribution. Additionally, the requirement for microbusinesses to verify physician recommendations is seen as a double-edged sword: while it seeks to protect patients, there are worries about the increased burden on these small businesses and the implications for local government regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1064

Cannabis: operator and separate premises license types: excessive concentration of licenses.

CA AB471

Cannabis catering.

CA AB1207

Cannabis: labeling and advertising.

CA AB2555

Sales and use tax: exemption: medicinal cannabis: donations.

CA SB512

Cannabis: taxation: gross receipts.

CA AB1610

Cannabis: Department of Cannabis Control.

CA AB687

California Cannabis Authority.

CA SB540

Cannabis and cannabis products: health warnings.

CA SB1059

Cannabis: local taxation: gross receipts.

CA AB420

Cannabis: industrial hemp.

Similar Bills

CA AB1034

Cannabis: retail preparation, sale, or consumption of noncannabis food and beverage products.

CA AB64

Cannabis: licensure and regulation.

CA SB829

Cannabis: donations.

CA SB1064

Cannabis: operator and separate premises license types: excessive concentration of licenses.

CA SB118

Cannabis: licenses: criminal records.

CA AB133

Cannabis Regulation.

CA AB3261

Cannabis.

CA AB1465

Cannabis: consumption cafe/lounge license.