Michigan Senate Bill SB0122

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/25
• Refer: 3/5/25

Caption

Health: other; enforcement powers of the department of health and human services under the public health code; modify. Amends secs. 2251, 2253, 2433, 2435, 2441, 2451, 2453, 2481, 12613, 13104, 13105a, 13108, 13516, 13736, 13737, 13738 & 20919 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.2251 et seq.) & repeals secs. 1299, 2241, 2242, 2243, 2244, 2245, 2246, 2255, 2261, 2262, 2263, 2437, 2443, 2446, 2455, 2461, 2462, 2463 & 2465 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.1299 et seq.).

Impact

This legislation intends to strengthen the DHHS's capability to respond during public health crises by modifying existing statutory frameworks. The proposed amendments grant the director the authority to implement emergency procedures including limiting visits to qualified health care facilities for 30 days post-declaration of an epidemic. SB0122 further emphasizes the right of patient representatives to visit and manage the care of patients with cognitive impairments, with certain safety protocols being established to foster safe interactions.

Summary

Senate Bill 122 (SB0122) aims to amend the Public Health Code of Michigan, specifically targeting the enforcement powers of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) during public health emergencies. The bill establishes protocols for the director of DHHS to issue emergency orders aimed at protecting public health during epidemics. It addresses the ability to limit communications and visitation to residents within qualified health care facilities, making provisions particularly for patients with cognitive impairments, while also introducing safety measures for visitations during such emergencies.

Contention

Noteworthy debates surrounding SB0122 concern the balance between necessary public health measures and individual rights. Advocates argue that having structured visitation rights for patients, especially those with cognitive difficulties, is vital during health emergencies, ensuring they are not cut off from essential support. Conversely, critics raise concerns about the potential overreach of governmental authority that could limit personal freedoms under the guise of public health emergencies, suggesting that the bill may infringe on both personal liberties and the operational independence of health care facilities.