Hawaii House Bill HCR57

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/25
• Refer: 3/14/25
• Report Pass: 3/28/25
• Engrossed: 3/28/25
• Refer: 3/31/25
• Report Pass: 4/15/25
• Passed: 4/16/25

Caption

Urging The Department Of Transportation Services Of The City And County Of Honolulu To Conduct A Traffic Mitigation And Calming Study To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Certain Traffic Mitigation And Calming Devices In And Around Paiwa Street In Waipahu, Oahu.

Impact

The potential impact of HCR57 is significant for the community surrounding Paiwa Street. By urging the city’s transportation department to evaluate and implement effective traffic mitigation strategies, the resolution seeks to improve public safety and the overall quality of life for residents. The anticipated study will provide insights and data on traffic patterns, enabling informed decision-making for future road safety improvements.

Summary

HCR57 urges the Department of Transportation Services of the City and County of Honolulu to conduct a comprehensive traffic mitigation and calming study focused on Paiwa Street in Waipahu, Oahu. Concerns have been raised by residents regarding excessive speeding, high traffic volume, and the associated risks for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. This resolution emphasizes the importance of evaluating the effectiveness of various traffic calming measures, including speed bumps and raised crosswalks, to enhance road safety in the area.

Conclusion

The resolution calls for a report of findings and recommendations submitted before the next legislative session, suggesting that ongoing dialogue and evaluation will be essential in determining the success of any proposed traffic mitigation efforts. HCR57 reflects a growing recognition of the need for tailored safety measures in heavily trafficked urban areas, highlighting traffic control as a crucial aspect of urban planning.

Contention

While this resolution does not appear to have sparked any major public contention yet, it indicates a proactive approach toward addressing community safety concerns, which could become a focal point for future discussions. Stakeholders may voice differing opinions on the necessity and feasibility of the recommended traffic calming devices, as well as potential budget implications and community priorities.