Relating to the availability of certain personal information of a member of the governing board of an institution of higher education, the chief executive officer of the institution, or the chief executive officer of a university system.
The bill introduces a modification of Section 552.117 of the Government Code, which delineates the exceptions applicable to public information requests, effectively extending protections to individuals in leadership positions within higher education. This legislative change will primarily impact how personal information is handled by governmental bodies, ensuring that officials can operate with a degree of privacy that might have been previously lacking. This measure is expected to bolster the sense of security for these individuals, potentially encouraging more qualified individuals to take on roles in higher education governance without fear of harassment or threats to their personal safety.
House Bill 4136 seeks to modify regulations regarding the accessibility of personal information for members of the governing boards of institutions of higher education and their chief executives. The bill amends existing provisions to ensure enhanced privacy protections for these individuals, specifically regarding their home addresses, telephone numbers, and other sensitive personal data. With the growing concerns around safety and privacy of public officials in educational institutions, this bill aims to mitigate risks associated with potential public exposure of such information.
The sentiment surrounding HB 4136 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among stakeholders within the higher education sector who view the bill as a necessary step for protection against identity theft and personal safety threats. Advocates argue that providing increased privacy for educational leaders is critical in today’s climate, where threats against public officials have become more common. However, there might be some concerns from transparency advocates who argue that any limitations on public information access could hinder accountability and lead to a decrease in public trust in higher education governance.
Notable points of contention could arise from the fine balance between privacy and transparency in governance. While proponents of the bill champion the increased protections, opponents may question how far privacy measures could go in limiting public access to information that ensures accountability in educational institutions. The bill's enactment would require careful monitoring and additional discussions around how these changes could affect public perceptions of accountability and governance in state institutions, especially as it relates to decision-making processes that impact student and community welfare.
Government Code
Occupations Code
Family Code
Human Resources Code
Education Code
Code Of Criminal Procedure
Tax Code