Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB40

Filed
3/14/25  
Out of House Committee
5/6/25  
Voted on by House
5/13/25  
Out of Senate Committee
5/25/25  
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the business court.

Impact

The implementation of HB 40 signifies a notable change in the Texas judicial landscape. It grants concurrent civil jurisdiction to the newly formed business court along with district courts for cases where the amount in controversy exceeds a specified threshold. The intention behind this bill is to reduce delays and provide specialized knowledge in handling complex business litigation, which is anticipated to not only enhance the efficiency of these cases but also to improve the overall business environment in Texas. The act also articulates the capacity for expedited appeals and the seamless transfer of cases to business court when appropriate.

Summary

House Bill 40 aims to establish a specialized business court in Texas, focusing on complex commercial disputes and enhancing the efficiency of the judicial process for business-related cases. This act outlines provisions for jurisdiction, specific civil procedures to be followed, and the overall framework for how cases will be handled in this new court. By addressing a unique set of legal issues faced by business entities, the bill is expected to streamline processes that may currently lag in district courts, especially for cases with significant financial stakes.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding House Bill 40 is largely supportive among business groups and legal professionals who advocate that a dedicated business court will facilitate a better resolution process for commercial disputes. Conversely, some critics express concerns regarding the potential backlog it could create if not properly managed. These dissenters worry that additional specialized courts could lead to an uneven distribution of cases and resources within the broader judicial system, impacting the accessibility of justice for smaller entities.

Contention

Discussion around HB 40 revealed differing opinions concerning jurisdictional authority and the implications for local courts. Supporters argue that a specialized court is necessary to navigate the complexities of business-related issues effectively, while opponents caution that this centralization may undermine local judicial systems and create disparities. Another point of contention arises from concerns regarding the cost and administration of such a court, especially with regard to its funding, operational efficiency, and potential impact on existing court dockets.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Government Code

  • Chapter 25. Statutory County Courts
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 0041
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 71. Texas Judicial Council
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 74. Court Administration Act
    • Section: 003
    • Section: 041
    • Section: 045
    • Section: 003
    • Section: 162
  • Chapter 411. Department Of Public Safety Of The State Of Texas
    • Section: 171
    • Section: 171
  • Chapter 659. Compensation
    • Section: 012
  • Chapter 21. General Provisions
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 1. General Provisions
    • Section: New Section

Civil Practice And Remedies Code

  • Chapter 30. Miscellaneous Provisions
    • Section: 017
    • Section: 017
    • Section: 014
    • Section: 015
    • Section: 016
    • Section: 017
  • Chapter 51. Appeals
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 172. Arbitration And Conciliation Of International Commercial Disputes
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 172
    • Section: 173
    • Section: 175
    • Section: 173
    • Section: 175
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 173
    • Section: 173
    • Section: 175
  • Chapter 171. General Arbitration
    • Section: 093
    • Section: 094
    • Section: 095
    • Section: 096
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 095
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 093
    • Section: 096
  • Chapter 1. General Provisions
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 61. Attachment
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 63. Garnishment
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 64. Receivership
    • Section: 091
    • Section: 091
    • Section: 093
  • Chapter 80. Trespass: Outdoor Sign
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 65. Injunction
    • Section: New Section
    • Section: 045
  • Chapter 151. Trial By Special Judge
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 37. Declaratory Judgments
    • Section: New Section
  • Chapter 39. Default Judgments In Certain Cases Defended By Attorney General
    • Section: New Section

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX SB1717

Relating to the operation and administration of the judicial branch of state government.

TX HB3445

Relating to the operation and administration of the judicial branch of state government.

TX HB79

Relating to fiscal and other matters necessary for implementation of the judiciary budget as enacted by H.B. No. 1, Acts of the 82nd Legislature, Regular Session, 2011, and to the operation and administration of, and practice and procedures in courts in, the judicial branch of state government.

TX HB19

Relating to the creation of a specialty trial court to hear certain cases; authorizing fees.