Relating to the sunset review of certain river authorities.
Impact
This legislation carries significant implications for the governance of water resources in Texas. By placing these river authorities under sunset review, it enforces a level of accountability and oversight that may lead to the reallocation of resources or the dissolution of agencies deemed ineffective. The bill aims to ensure that taxpayer money is utilized effectively while addressing the changing needs surrounding water management in the state. If enacted, it would potentially reshape how water resources are governed, emphasizing efficiency and the necessity of each authority.
Summary
Senate Bill 725 pertains to the sunset review process for certain river authorities within Texas. Specifically, it aims to amend the Government Code to subject certain river authorities to a review and potential abolishment process akin to that which state agencies undergo. The bill identifies specific authorities, including the Brazos River Authority and the San Antonio River Authority, requiring them to adhere to the sunset provisions, which involve periodic reviews to assess their need and functionality. The result of these reviews could lead to the abolition of authorities if they are found unnecessary.
Contention
There might be potential points of contention surrounding SB725, particularly regarding the implications of abolishing certain authorities. Supporters argue that sunset reviews foster accountability and efficiency, which are essential for managing public resources effectively. Conversely, opponents may contend that such measures could weaken local control over water management and jeopardize the operations of authorities that play crucial roles in regional water supply and environmental management.
Relating to the review date for certain governmental entities subject to the sunset review process and the regulation of horse racing by the Texas Racing Commission.
Relating to the San Jacinto River Authority, following recommendations of the Sunset Advisory Commission; specifying grounds for the removal of a member of the board of directors.
Relating to the San Jacinto River Authority, following recommendations of the Sunset Advisory Commission; specifying grounds for the removal of a member of the board of directors.
Relating to the Upper Guadalupe River Authority, following the recommendations of the Sunset Advisory Commission; altering terms of the board of directors; specifying grounds for the removal of a member of the board of directors.
Relating to the Lavaca-Navidad River Authority, following the recommendations of the Sunset Advisory Commission; altering terms of the board of directors; specifying grounds for the removal of a member of the board of directors.
Relating to the Lavaca-Navidad River Authority, following the recommendations of the Sunset Advisory Commission; altering terms of the board of directors; specifying grounds for the removal of a member of the board of directors.
Relating to the Upper Guadalupe River Authority, following the recommendations of the Sunset Advisory Commission; altering terms of the board of directors; specifying grounds for the removal of a member of the board of directors.