New York Senate Bill S07512

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/21/25
• Refer: 4/21/25

Caption

Requires heating oil sold for use in any building in the state to be bioheating fuel that contains minimum percentages of biodiesel and/or renewable hydrocarbon diesel.

Impact

The impact of S07512, if enacted, would be significant on state energy policy, marking a shift towards renewable energy sources for heating. It would not only lead to a gradual increase in the use of biodiesel and renewable hydrocarbons in heating oil but also encourages local production of these biofuels. This could stimulate economic activity within the renewable energy sector and contribute to New York's climate goals by reducing carbon footprints associated with heating. However, meeting these requirements may present challenges for suppliers regarding sourcing and production capabilities.

Summary

Bill S07512 amends the Environmental Conservation Law in New York to mandate that all heating oil sold for use in buildings contains a minimum percentage of biodiesel and/or renewable hydrocarbon diesel. The bill outlines a phased implementation, requiring heating oil to contain at least 5% bioheating fuel starting July 1, 2022, with subsequent increases to 10% by 2025, 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2039. This legislative effort aims to promote cleaner energy alternatives and reduce reliance on traditional petroleum-based heating oil, aligning with broader environmental goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the state.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the feasibility and cost implications of the bioheating fuel mandates. While proponents view the bill as a necessary transition toward sustainability, critics might argue about the economic impact on consumers and the heating oil industry. There may be concerns related to the supply chain for biodiesel, particularly in ensuring that there is adequate availability and affordability of these renewable fuels to meet the required benchmarks set by the bill. Additionally, provisions like the ability for the governor to suspend requirements may lead to debates over regulatory consistency and industry compliance.