Rhode Island House Bill H6288

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/30/25
• Refer: 4/30/25
• Report Pass: 5/8/25
• Passed: 5/13/25

Caption

HOUSE RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE REPORTING AND EXPIRATION DATES OF THE SPECIAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION TO STUDY AND REVIEW THE COST AND STATUS OF THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND OWNED, VACANT, AND ABANDONED PROPERTIES AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR METHODS TO MITIGATE THE ASSOCIATED EXPENSES (Extends the reporting and expiration dates of the Commission to review the cost and status of State owned, vacant, and abandoned properties and makes recommendations to mitigate expenses to May 24, 2026, and expires December 15, 2026.)

Impact

The bill underscores the state's ongoing commitment to addressing the financial burdens posed by unutilized properties that the state owns. By extending the timeline for the commission's work, the Rhode Island legislature aims to ensure that detailed investigations and recommendations can be made regarding the management of these properties. This could lead to significant changes in how the state handles its real estate assets, potentially affecting local economies by alleviating the costs associated with maintaining these properties.

Summary

House Bill H6288 is a resolution that extends the reporting and expiration dates of a special legislative commission tasked with studying and reviewing the costs associated with state-owned, vacant, and abandoned properties in Rhode Island. Originally established in 2022, this commission has been given more time to evaluate the status of these properties and to make recommendations aimed at mitigating related expenses. The new reporting deadline is set for May 24, 2026, with the commission set to expire on December 15, 2026.

Contention

While the bill itself appears to be a procedural extension, it may signal deeper debates regarding property management and state versus local responsibilities in Rhode Island. Some lawmakers might voice concerns about the effectiveness and necessity of the commission, questioning whether extending the timeline will yield any substantial outcomes. Additionally, discussions surrounding the implications of managing vacant and abandoned properties often involve competing views on state investment and local accountability.