Michigan Senate Bill SB0505

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/14/25
• Refer: 8/14/25

Caption

Environmental protection: hazardous products; Michigan statewide microplastics strategy; establish. Amends 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.101 - 324.90106) by adding pt. 151.

Impact

The proposed bill aims to generate a systematic approach to understanding microplastics, including their sources, concentrations, and potential risks. By requiring the development of a detailed plan to guide this research, SB0505 emphasizes the need for evidence-based policy decisions related to environmental health. The expected outcomes include specific strategies for monitoring microplastics, identifying pollution sources, and evaluating the consequences on local ecosystems and water quality. This bill could significantly alter state regulations concerning environmental monitoring and pollution control, setting a precedent for addressing similar environmental health issues in the future.

Summary

Senate Bill 0505 proposes to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act to establish a comprehensive statewide microplastics research and monitoring plan in Michigan. The bill mandates the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy to coordinate with various state agencies and research institutions to assess the prevalence of microplastics in the environment, particularly in the Great Lakes, and evaluate their impact on human health and ecological systems. This research is designed to address one of the growing environmental challenges that microplastics present, specifically to the vital resources and health of Michigan's residents and wildlife.

Contention

Despite its intent to protect environmental and public health, this bill may face contention regarding the allocation of state resources for research initiatives, especially in light of prior budget constraints. Critics might argue that the funding required for extensive research and monitoring could divert attention from more immediate environmental issues or that the scope of the bill is too broad and not sufficiently focused on actionable solutions. Additionally, discussions may arise about the prioritization of scientific research versus direct environmental intervention measures. Consequently, stakeholders will likely debate how best to balance funding and policy efforts to address the growing concerns over microplastics without compromising other environmental initiatives.