Us Congress Senate Bill SJR76

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/4/25
• Refer: 9/4/25

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Extension of Deadlines in Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Climate Review Final Rule".

Impact

If SJR76 is passed, it will effectively nullify the EPA's recently established rule, which proponents argue is overly burdensome for the oil and natural gas industries. The intent behind this congressional disapproval is to ease regulatory pressures on these sectors and ensure they can operate without stringent federal oversight on emissions. This could lead to a re-evaluation of environmental standards, potentially resulting in a rollback of protections aimed at controlling greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing air quality.

Summary

SJR76 is a joint resolution that seeks congressional disapproval of a rule established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding emissions standards related to the oil and natural gas sector. This rule, titled 'Extension of Deadlines in Standards of Performance for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources and Emissions Guidelines for Existing Sources', aims to provide stricter emissions guidelines for the oil and gas industry. The resolution serves as a mechanism for Congress to express its disapproval of the EPA's rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5, United States Code, which addresses legislative procedures for disapproving rules.

Contention

The measure has sparked notable debate among lawmakers, reflecting broader tensions surrounding environmental policy and economic growth. Supporters of SJR76, primarily from industries reliant on fossil fuels, advocate for reducing regulatory burdens as essential for maintaining competitive advantage and economic prosperity. In contrast, environmental advocates and some legislators express concern that disapproving the EPA's rule could undermine progress on tackling climate change and protecting public health. This ongoing contention highlights the significant ideological divide regarding environmental stewardship versus economic development in legislative discussions.