Texas Senate Bill SB530

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/26/11
• Introduced: 2/7/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/29/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/19/11
• Report Pass: 4/26/11
• Voted on by House: 5/23/11
• Engrossed: 4/29/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/2/11
• Enrolled: 5/23/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to granting limited state law enforcement authority to special agents of the Office of Inspector General of the United States Social Security Administration and to updating certain references related to the grant of that authority to other federal law enforcement personnel.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would have implications for the jurisdictional boundaries of law enforcement agencies at both the state and federal level. It emphasizes the importance of federally-backed operations dealing with social security fraud and related crimes, allowing federal agents to operate with more authority within Texas. The bill aims to support increased efficacy in tackling crimes that cross state lines, thereby improving public safety.

Summary

SB530 proposes to extend limited law enforcement authority to special agents of the Office of Inspector General of the United States Social Security Administration. This bill seeks to update state law by granting these federal agents powers of arrest, search, and seizure concerning felony offenses, while clarifying their status within state jurisdiction. The intent behind this legislation is to enhance collaboration between state and federal law enforcement agencies, ensuring effective enforcement of laws related to social security and potentially other overlapping criminal activities.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB530 may arise from concerns about the expansion of federal authority in local law enforcement matters. Opponents of the bill could argue that such an expansion risks undermining local law enforcement autonomy and encroaching upon the rights of individuals under Texas law. Additionally, questions about accountability and oversight of federal agents operating with state law enforcement authority might be raised, prompting discussions about the balance of power and jurisdiction between federal and state entities.