Texas Senate Bill SCR33

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/11/11
• Refer: 3/16/11

Caption

Urging Congress to consider removal of the border wall in places where the border is already adequately guarded.

Impact

The proposed resolution seeks to address concerns about property rights, particularly regarding the historic land grants secured by families prior to the establishment of the United States. It emphasizes the need for just compensation for those landowners affected by the wall, who may experience diminished access and value of their properties. Additionally, the resolution draws attention to environmental degradation caused by the construction and presence of the border wall, as well as its disruption to local ecosystems and habitats.

Summary

SCR33 is a concurrent resolution urging the United States Congress to consider the removal of the border wall in areas where it is deemed adequately guarded by federal officials. The resolution highlights several issues, including the adverse effects of the border wall on local residents and their properties, particularly in the Brownsville area. It points out that the wall not only inconveniences landowners by cutting through their properties but also negatively impacts local businesses that rely on customers from areas divided by the wall.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SCR33 appears to be in support of revisiting the implications of the border wall. Proponents of the resolution advocate for addressing the grievances of local residents and businesses who have suffered under the current conditions. However, there may be contention regarding national security perspectives, as advocates for stronger border control may oppose the resolution’s call for removal in certain areas, fearing it could weaken enforcement capabilities.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention arising from SCR33 revolves around the balance between local autonomy and federal security protocols. Local residents and businesses express the need for their property rights and economic interests to be respected, juxtaposed against arguments for the necessity of the border wall in controlling immigration and protecting national security. This creates a complex dialogue on how best to approach border management without compromising the livelihoods of those directly affected.