Relating to the imposition of a tax on certain sweetened beverages and ingredients used to make certain sweetened beverages and to the use of certain revenue for the promotion of children's health programs; providing penalties.
Impact
If passed, HB2213 would affect various laws regarding the taxation of sugary drinks and redirect revenue to support initiatives aimed at promoting children's health. The funds will be split between the Texas Education Agency, which would receive 80% of the collected revenue to implement health programs in schools, and the Department of State Health Services, which would receive the remaining 20% for similar health promotion efforts. This financial support could enhance school health environments and programs and improve education concerning nutrition and physical health among children.
Summary
House Bill 2213 aims to impose a tax on certain sweetened beverages and ingredients used to make these beverages in Texas, with the revenue generated from this tax being allocated toward children's health programs. The bill defines 'sweetened beverages' as carbonated or non-carbonated drinks containing natural or artificial sweeteners, and specifically outlines the calculations for the tax, which is set at five cents per 12-ounce increment, subject to annual adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index. A notable aspect of the bill is the treatment of small exemptions for certain beverages considered unfit for sale, along with penalties for non-compliance with tax obligations.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB2213 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the tax could help reduce the consumption of sugary beverages among children, thereby addressing a significant public health issue related to obesity and associated diseases. They believe that redirecting funds toward children’s health will create long-term benefits for the state. However, opponents may raise concerns regarding potential economic implications for retailers or the fairness of imposing additional taxes on specific types of products, which could lead to reduced consumer choices or increased prices.
Contention
Points of contention in discussions regarding HB2213 include the effectiveness and fairness of the proposed tax, particularly how it might disproportionately affect lower-income families. Critics may argue that rather than taxing sugary drinks, educational programs on nutrition and health would be a more effective strategy for combating childhood obesity. Additionally, questions may arise about the specific allocation of revenue and whether the designated funds will be sufficient to make a meaningful impact on children's health services and education.
Relating to state and municipal motor fuel taxes; providing civil penalties; creating criminal offenses; requiring occupational licenses; authorizing the imposition of taxes; providing for increases and decreases in the rates of taxes.
Relating to an excise tax on, and storage, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements for, certain nontobacco nicotine products; providing a civil penalty; imposing a tax.
Relating to the use of hotel occupancy tax revenue by certain municipalities and counties and the authority of certain municipalities to receive certain tax revenue derived from a hotel and convention center project and to pledge certain tax revenue for the payment of obligations related to the project.
Relating to the use of hotel occupancy tax revenue by certain municipalities and counties and the authority of certain municipalities to receive certain tax revenue derived from a hotel and convention center project and to pledge certain tax revenue for the payment of obligations related to the project.
Relating to agreements authorizing a limitation on taxable value of certain property to provide for the creation of jobs and the generation of state and local tax revenue; authorizing fees; authorizing penalties.
Relating to a Pan American Games trust fund, an Olympic Games trust fund, a Major Events trust fund, a Motor Sports Racing trust fund, and an Events trust fund for sporting and non-sporting events, and to the abolishment of the special event trust fund.
Relating to the establishment and duties of an event oversight committee for an event eligible to receive funding through a major events trust fund; limiting payments from the fund to reimbursement for attracting unique events to Texas.
Relating to the events and expenses eligible for, reporting requirements concerning disbursements from, and a study by the comptroller of the Major Events trust fund and the Events trust fund.
Relating to state economic development measures, including administration of the Texas Enterprise Fund, creation of the Economic Incentive Oversight Board and the governor's university research initiative, abolishment of the Texas emerging technology fund, and renaming the Major Events trust fund to the Major Events Reimbursement Program.
Relating to the establishment and duties of an event oversight committee for an event eligible to receive funding through an events trust fund for certain municipalities and counties.