Texas House Bill HB2213

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/4/11
• Refer: 3/10/11

Caption

Relating to the imposition of a tax on certain sweetened beverages and ingredients used to make certain sweetened beverages and to the use of certain revenue for the promotion of children's health programs; providing penalties.

Impact

If passed, HB2213 would affect various laws regarding the taxation of sugary drinks and redirect revenue to support initiatives aimed at promoting children's health. The funds will be split between the Texas Education Agency, which would receive 80% of the collected revenue to implement health programs in schools, and the Department of State Health Services, which would receive the remaining 20% for similar health promotion efforts. This financial support could enhance school health environments and programs and improve education concerning nutrition and physical health among children.

Summary

House Bill 2213 aims to impose a tax on certain sweetened beverages and ingredients used to make these beverages in Texas, with the revenue generated from this tax being allocated toward children's health programs. The bill defines 'sweetened beverages' as carbonated or non-carbonated drinks containing natural or artificial sweeteners, and specifically outlines the calculations for the tax, which is set at five cents per 12-ounce increment, subject to annual adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index. A notable aspect of the bill is the treatment of small exemptions for certain beverages considered unfit for sale, along with penalties for non-compliance with tax obligations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB2213 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the tax could help reduce the consumption of sugary beverages among children, thereby addressing a significant public health issue related to obesity and associated diseases. They believe that redirecting funds toward children’s health will create long-term benefits for the state. However, opponents may raise concerns regarding potential economic implications for retailers or the fairness of imposing additional taxes on specific types of products, which could lead to reduced consumer choices or increased prices.

Contention

Points of contention in discussions regarding HB2213 include the effectiveness and fairness of the proposed tax, particularly how it might disproportionately affect lower-income families. Critics may argue that rather than taxing sugary drinks, educational programs on nutrition and health would be a more effective strategy for combating childhood obesity. Additionally, questions may arise about the specific allocation of revenue and whether the designated funds will be sufficient to make a meaningful impact on children's health services and education.