Texas Senate Bill SB1269

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/8/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/12/11
• Voted on by Senate: 4/21/11
• Refer: 3/16/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/2/11
• Report Pass: 4/12/11
• Voted on by House: 5/3/11
• Engrossed: 4/21/11
• Governor Action: 5/12/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Report Pass: 4/29/11
• Enrolled: 5/4/11
• Passed: 5/12/11

Caption

Relating to transportation, lodging, and meals offered to and accepted by public servants.

Impact

The legislation's impact on state laws is significant as it seeks to distinguish between acceptable gifts and political contributions. By clearly defining transportation, lodging, and meals as permissible forms of support, SB1269 alleviates potential legal complications for public servants who attend functions in a professional capacity. This change may encourage better support and appreciation for public servants, promoting transparency in their activities and the expenses incurred during the performance of their duties.

Summary

SB1269 amends the Penal Code to clarify the treatment of transportation, lodging, and meals provided to public servants. Specifically, the bill states that these benefits are not classified as political contributions under Title 15 of the Election Code, ensuring that public servants can accept such benefits without the implications of changing their legal status or financial reporting requirements. This amendment addresses the need for transparency while allowing public servants to receive certain forms of support without fear of political contribution violations.

Contention

Notable points of contention raised during discussions regarding SB1269 include concerns about potential misuse of the provisions in the bill. Critics argue that the broad classification may open the door for unethical practices, as it could be challenging to monitor the nature and purposes of these benefits. Advocates of the bill counter that clear reporting requirements and definitions will safeguard against abuse. Overall, the legislative discourse reflects a tension between the need for public servants to receive support and the imperative to maintain ethical standards in governance.