Texas House Bill HB821

Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Caption

Relating to the punishment for the offense of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence.

Impact

If enacted, HB821 would effectively update and clarify the existing legal framework surrounding evidence tampering in Texas. It specifies the degree of felonies associated with tampering offenses and serves to enhance the penalties for those who engage in such actions, particularly in serious cases involving human remains. The bill will ensure that law enforcement has a more robust set of tools to address instances where evidence is manipulated, which could greatly impact the outcomes of investigations and prosecutions. By amending the Penal Code, it aims to deter potential offenders from altering or concealing evidence, thereby promoting justice.

Summary

House Bill 821 aims to amend the Penal Code of Texas regarding the punishment for the offense of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence. The bill articulates specific definitions and criteria for what constitutes such offenses, delineating various actions that can be classified as tampering, such as altering or concealing evidence with the intent to impact an investigation. Importantly, HB821 sets out different degrees of felonies based on the nature of the evidence tampered with, including a more severe penalty for cases involving human corpses, thereby reinforcing the seriousness of these offenses within law enforcement contexts.

Sentiment

The legislative sentiment around HB821 appears to be largely supportive among those who prioritize effective law enforcement and the integrity of the judicial process. Proponents of the bill argue that it is necessary to enhance penalties and provide clearer language for prosecuting tampering offenses, which they view as crucial to uphold justice and maintain public confidence in the legal system. In contrast, there might be some concerns regarding potential overreach or the implications of strict penalties on due process, indicating a need for a balanced approach in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB821 may revolve around the specifics of the penalties and the definitions of tampering set forth in the bill. Critics may raise questions about the balance between necessary legal measures and the risks of overly punitive consequences that could inadvertently affect innocent parties or those involved in less severe instances of tampering. Additionally, discussions may also highlight the broader implications of the bill on the rights of individuals involved in investigations and the standard of proof required to impose such significant legal consequences.