Texas 2013 - 83rd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2680

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to state financing for certain transportation projects.

Impact

If enacted, HB2680 will amend the Transportation Code to create a framework for analyzing and financing transportation projects based on established economic principles. The bill introduces an economically driven mobility project subaccount, which will prioritize projects that promote economic development, create transportation corridors, provide local financial participation, and demonstrate sustainable economic value. This legislative change aims to streamline project funding and enhance cooperation between state and local governments in transportation development.

Summary

House Bill 2680 focuses on enhancing state financing for specific transportation projects by mandating an independent analysis of highway or road projects before financing is offered to local political subdivisions. This bill is intended to improve the selection process for transportation projects by requiring thorough evaluations that assess both the suitability of financing mechanisms and the potential revenue impacts of the projects. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is tasked with developing educational programs and a project application process for local entities to facilitate this approach.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB2680 appears to be generally positive, with supporters emphasizing the need for structured evaluation processes for transportation financing. Advocates argue that the bill will lead to more effective use of state resources and foster economic growth by better aligning projects with local needs and financial realities. However, there may also be concerns about the feasibility of requiring local governments to adopt specific financing mechanisms, which could limit their flexibility in managing projects.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, there are potential points of contention regarding the provisions of HB2680. Critics may raise concerns about the possible implications for local governance, questioning how mandatory evaluations and prescribed financing structures might limit the autonomy of local entities in project planning and execution. Ensuring that local needs are adequately considered while adhering to state-mandated procedures could represent a significant challenge in the implementation of this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2237

Transportation planning: regional transportation improvement plan: sustainable communities strategies: alternative planning strategy: state transportation funding.

CA SB1369

Energy: green electrolytic hydrogen.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

HI HB699

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

HI SB770

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

CA AB1525

Transportation projects: priority populations.

HI HB1681

Relating To Transportation Network Companies.