Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H1751

Introduced
2/16/23  

Caption

Concerning payments on personal injury protection benefit claims

Impact

The implications of H1751 on state laws could be significant in the realm of personal injury litigation and insurance disputes. By enabling the court to assess costs and fees even after a payment from the insurer, the bill seeks to ensure that legal practitioners can be compensated for their work when they have initiated claims on behalf of clients. This can encourage more individuals to pursue legitimate claims for personal injury protection, knowing that they have legal recourse for their attorney's fees, thus potentially leading to a rise in litigation over disputes where insurers are involved.

Overall

Overall, H1751 brings forth an agenda to enhance the rights of claimants in personal injury protection cases while also revisiting the operational mandates on insurers regarding timely payments. This bill could reshape the landscape of personal injury claims in Massachusetts, emphasizing a more claimant-friendly approach in the legal system.

Summary

House Bill H1751 proposes amendments to the fourth paragraph of section 34M of chapter 90 of the General Laws, specifically concerning payments related to personal injury protection benefit claims. This legislation aims to clarify the regulations surrounding the assessment of court costs and attorney fees in instances where insurance payments are made after the initiation of a legal action but before a judgment is rendered. It asserts that even if insurers pay the required amounts during the proceedings, the court retains the authority to award costs and fees incurred until such payment is made.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding H1751 may arise from insurance companies who could argue that this amendment increases their financial burden through additional fees ordered by the courts. Insurers may view it as a disincentive against making timely payments, possibly leading to longer litigation processes. Additionally, some lawmaker discussions could focus on balancing the interests of consumers seeking fair representation for personal injury claims against the operational costs and challenges faced by insurance providers when responding to multiple claims.

Companion Bills

MA S1829

Similar To To ensure timely restitution payments to victims of crime

MA S1162

Similar To Relative to non-fault unemployment insurance overpayments

MA H1749

Similar To Concerning payments on personal injury protection benefit claims

MA H4616

Similar To To exclude Chapter 115 payments to veterans from gross household income calculations

MA H4517

Replaced by Study Order

Previously Filed As

MA H1369

Relative to public housing authorities

MA H1970

Relative to transfer of actions to the housing court

MA H1303

To provide prompt payment following settlement by insurance company

MA H1942

Relative to unemployment benefits for replacement workers

MA H1971

To restore the statute of limitations for wrongful death claims

MA H1746

Relative to tort actions for latent diseases

MA H2164

Relative to institutions of higher education

MA H1562

Relative to locksmiths and notice to property owners

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.