Massachusetts 2023-2024 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H1947 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 02/16/2023

                            1 of 1
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 122       FILED ON: 1/9/2023
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1947
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_________________
PRESENTED BY:
Lindsay N. Sabadosa and Paul W. Mark
_________________
To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in General
Court assembled:
The undersigned legislators and/or citizens respectfully petition for the adoption of the accompanying bill:
An Act relative to unemployment compensation and labor disputes.
_______________
PETITION OF:
NAME:DISTRICT/ADDRESS :DATE ADDED:Lindsay N. Sabadosa1st Hampshire1/9/2023Paul W. MarkBerkshire, Hampden, Franklin and 
Hampshire
1/9/2023 1 of 3
HOUSE DOCKET, NO. 122       FILED ON: 1/9/2023
HOUSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No. 1947
By Representative Sabadosa of Northampton and Senator Mark, a joint petition (accompanied by 
bill, House, No. 1947) of Lindsay N. Sabadosa and Paul W. Mark relative to unemployment 
compensation and labor disputes. Labor and Workforce Development.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
_______________
In the One Hundred and Ninety-Third General Court
(2023-2024)
_______________
An Act relative to unemployment compensation and labor disputes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority 
of the same, as follows:
1 Section 25 of Chapter 151A of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2018 Official 
2Edition, is hereby amended by striking out section (b) and inserting in place thereof the 
3following:-
4 (b) Any week with respect to which the commissioner finds that his unemployment is 
5due to a stoppage of work which exists because of a labor dispute at the factory, establishment or 
6other premises at which he was last employed for a period of 30 days following the 
7commencement of the unemployment caused by the labor dispute, except that the period without 
8benefits shall not apply if the employer hires a permanent replacement worker for the claimant’s 
9position. A replacement worker shall be presumed to be permanent unless the employer certifies 
10in writing that the claimant will be permitted to return to their prior position upon conclusion of 
11the dispute. If the employer does not permit the return, the claimant shall be entitled to recover 
12any benefits lost as a result of the 30 day waiting period before receiving benefits; however, no  2 of 3
13waiting period or disqualification under this subsection (b) shall apply if the labor dispute is 
14caused by the failure or refusal of the employer to comply with an agreement or contract between 
15the employer and the claimant, including a collective bargaining agreement with a union 
16representing the claimant, or a state or federal law pertaining to hours, wages, or conditions of 
17work; provided, however, that nothing in this subsection shall be construed so as to deny benefits 
18to an otherwise eligible individual (1) who becomes involuntarily unemployed during the period 
19of the negotiation of a collective bargaining contract, in which case the individual shall receive 
20benefits for the period of his unemployment but in no event beyond the date of the 
21commencement of a strike; or (2) who is not recalled to work within one week following the 
22termination of the labor dispute; and provided, further, that this subsection shall not apply if it is 
23shown to the satisfaction of the commissioner that:
24 (1) The employee is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor 
25dispute which caused the stoppage of work; and that
26 (2) The employee does not belong to a grade or class of workers of which, immediately 
27before the commencement of the stoppage, there were members employed at the premises at 
28which the stoppage occurs, any of whom are participating in or financing or directly interested in 
29the dispute, except that an individual for whom no work is available and who is not a member of 
30or eligible to membership in the group or organization which caused the stoppage, shall not be 
31considered as belonging to the same grade or class of 	workers as those who are responsible for 
32the stoppage of work; provided, further, that if, in any case, separate branches of work which are 
33commonly conducted as separate businesses in separate premises are conducted in separate 
34departments of the same premises, each such department may, for the purposes of this 
35subsection, be deemed a separate factory, establishment or other premises. 3 of 3
36 (3) For the purposes of this chapter, the payment of regular union dues or assessments 
37shall not be construed as participating in or financing or being directly interested in a labor 
38dispute.
39 (4) The individual has, subsequent to his unemployment because of a labor dispute, 
40obtained employment, and has been paid wages of not less than the amount specified in clause 
41(a) of section twenty-four; provided, however, that during the existence of such labor dispute the 
42wages of such individual used for the determination of his benefit rights shall not include any 
43wages such individual earned from the employer involved in such labor dispute.
44 In addition to the foregoing, an employee shall not be denied benefits as the result of an 
45employer's lockout, whether or not there is a stoppage of work, if such employees are ready, 
46willing and able to work under the terms and conditions of the existing or expired contract 
47pending the negotiation of a new contract unless the employer shows by a preponderance of 
48evidence that the lockout is in response to: (a) acts of repeated and substantial damage to the 
49employer's property, or (b) repeated threats of imminent, substantial damage; provided, however, 
50that such damage or threats of damage are caused or directed by members of the bargaining unit 
51with the express or implied approval of the officers of such unit, and the employer has taken all 
52reasonable measures to prevent such damage to property and such efforts have been 
53unsuccessful.
54 A lockout, as used in this subsection, shall exist whether or not such action is to obtain 
55for the employer more advantageous terms when an employer fails to provide employment to his 
56employees with whom he is engaged in a labor dispute, either by physically closing his plant or 
57informing his employees that there will be no work until the labor dispute has terminated.