Relative to child custody
The most significant aspect of HB 1963 is its provision that a parent's absence due to military duty will not be considered when modifying custody or visitation orders. This change is intended to prevent the penalization of service members who are deployed or mobilized, thereby fostering a more equitable legal environment for military parents in custody cases. By ensuring that military obligations do not adversely affect their parental rights, the bill aims to support the stability of children in these situations.
House Bill 1963, presented by Representative John H. Rogers, aims to amend Section 31 of Chapter 208 of the General Laws regarding child custody in the context of military service. The bill introduces specific definitions related to military deployments, including 'deployment', 'mobilization', and 'temporary duty', and establishes legal considerations for custody arrangements when a parent is activated for military duty. This amendment recognizes the unique challenges faced by military families and seeks to protect their rights during custody proceedings.
While the bill is primarily focused on protecting military families, it may raise concerns among family law practitioners regarding the balance between a parent’s military duties and the rights of the non-military parent. Critics of the bill might argue that the provisions could restrict the rights of the non-military parent to seek modification of custody based on practical considerations stemming from a military parent's absence. Additionally, there may be discussions on how these provisions interact with existing family law statutes, particularly in cases where the non-deploying parent may find themselves at a disadvantage regarding visitation or custody arrangements.