Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

Massachusetts House Bill H3319

Introduced
2/27/25  

Caption

Relative to municipal lobbying

Impact

The implementation of H3319 would expand the existing regulations on lobbying to include municipal levels, thereby increasing accountability in local governance. It mandates municipal agents to report on lobbying activities, including campaigns and expenditures that could influence local government officials. This reflects an effort to ensure that lobbying actions are conducted with transparency, which proponents argue is essential for maintaining public trust in government. By requiring municipal agents to adhere to these new regulations, the bill seeks to prevent potential abuses of power and ensure that local decisions are made based on community welfare rather than external influences.

Summary

House Bill H3319 seeks to amend the General Laws of Massachusetts to regulate municipal lobbying more effectively. The bill defines 'municipal agents' as individuals who engage in lobbying activities directed towards municipal officials in cities with populations exceeding 150,000. It specifically addresses lobbying actions that aim to influence decisions related to ordinances or administrative actions taken by covered municipal officials, ensuring that such influences are transparent and recorded. The bill places necessary definitions and frameworks for municipal lobbying within the state's law, aiming to create a clear regulatory environment for lobbying practices in cities.

Contention

Opinions regarding H3319 are divided among various stakeholder groups. Advocates of the bill stress the importance of transparency and accountability in local government, arguing that the potential for corruption in municipal lobbying necessitates a more robust regulatory framework. However, opponents express concerns that the increased regulations could impose burdens on local groups and individuals who may not have the resources to comply fully with complex reporting requirements. Moreover, skeptics of heightened regulations might argue that this could inadvertently reduce the ability of smaller entities to engage in local government affairs, thus limiting citizen engagement in the political process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB321

Late signature curing expenditure reports.

CA AB2447

California State University: fiscal transparency: internet website.

AZ HB2364

Lobbyists; gift ban exemption

AZ HB2089

Community colleges; expenditure limitation

CA AB1052

The Financial Information System for California (FISCal).

CA AB62

State government: FI$Cal: transparency.

CA SB468

Taxation: tax expenditures: California Tax Expenditure Review Board.

CA SB768

Transportation projects: comprehensive development lease agreements.