Massachusetts Senate Bill S1933

Massachusetts 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/25
• Refer: 2/27/25

Caption

To prevent property tax bill shocks

Impact

If enacted, S1933 would amend Chapter 59 of the General Laws of Massachusetts to allow cities and towns to implement 'tax shock prevention credits' aimed at reducing the third and fourth quarter tax bills for qualifying property owners. By affording municipalities the option to grant these credits, the bill enables local governments to tailor tax relief to address specific financial pressures affecting their constituents. Such changes are anticipated to particularly benefit senior homeowners and low-income families who may find themselves unable to afford steep increases in property taxes.

Summary

Senate Bill 1933, titled 'An Act to prevent property tax bill shocks', proposes to introduce a system of tax credits for property owners who qualify under specific conditions in order to mitigate significant increases in property tax bills, colloquially known as 'tax shock'. The bill defines 'eligible tax shock property' to include properties owned by senior citizens, individuals on MassHealth, those experiencing unemployment, and properties located in designated high-need neighborhoods. This measure is designed to provide financial relief during periods of abrupt tax rate increases, particularly in municipalities where the residential property tax levy increases by more than 10 percent within a fiscal year.

Contention

However, the bill’s implementation may raise notable concerns regarding the fiscal responsibilities of municipalities. While it provides a safety net for vulnerable populations, there may be disagreements about the potential strain on local budgets and whether cities and towns can sustainably support the proposed credits. Some legislators and stakeholders might voice apprehensions that the optional nature of the program could lead to inconsistent application across different communities, resulting in unequal access to tax relief based on locality. Additionally, the need for adequate funding and data sharing between state agencies and local governments poses operational challenges that need careful consideration.