Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB428

Introduced
1/20/22  
Refer
1/20/22  
Report Pass
3/7/22  
Engrossed
3/11/22  

Caption

Election Law - Foreign Manufacture of Election Systems - Notification and Termination of Contract

Impact

The passage of HB 428 could have significant implications for state laws related to election administration and the procurement of election-related services. By requiring election service providers to disclose the origins of their components, the bill aims to fortify public confidence in election security. In the event of any foreign control or influence detected in the manufacturing process, the State Administrator is authorized to terminate the contract, thus holding providers accountable for maintaining secure operations. The effectiveness of these provisions will be monitored as part of ongoing election integrity discussions.

Summary

House Bill 428 focuses on enhancing election security in Maryland by imposing stringent regulations on election service providers concerning the manufacturing of election systems. The bill mandates that the State Board of Elections cannot approve contracts with service providers unless these contracts explicitly require reporting on whether any components of the election systems were manufactured outside the United States. This requirement is intended to ensure that the integrity of election systems is maintained and that any foreign influence is minimized.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 428 appears to be broadly supportive among those advocating for stronger election security measures. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step in safeguarding elections from potential vulnerabilities posed by foreign-manufactured components. However, there may be nuanced concerns regarding the impact of these regulations on service providers and the potential for delays or complications in contract approvals, which some may see as burdensome.

Contention

Some points of contention regarding HB 428 may arise from the implications of forced disclosures and potential termination clauses for service providers. Critics could argue that such requirements might limit the participation of smaller or lesser-known firms in providing election services and may escalate costs associated with ensuring compliance. Furthermore, the definitions of 'foreign national' and the scope of what constitutes 'manufactured outside the United States' could lead to debates on enforcement and the feasibility of such regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MD HB130

Election Law - Foreign Manufacture of Election Systems - Notification and Termination of Contract

MD SB864

Election Reform Act of 2023

MD HB1812

Foreign interference in elections; registration, absentee voting, and conduct of elections.

MD HB894

Election Law – Voting Systems – Sourced, Manufactured, and Assembled in the United States

MD HB2521

Elections; foreign money

MD HB291

Election Law - Contested Elections

MD HB8988

Get Foreign Money Out of U.S. Elections Act

MD HB1033

Business Regulation - Electronic Smoking Devices Manufacturers - Certifications

MD SB4666

Get Foreign Money Out of U.S. Elections Act

MD SB101

Election Law - Contested Elections

Similar Bills

AL SB33

Public K-12 education, employment of assistant superintendents, assistant chief school finance officers, and assistant principals by contract provided for local boards of education

CA SB476

California Financing Law: program administrators.

CA SB242

Property Assessed Clean Energy program: program administrator.

HI HB849

Relating To Procurement.

CA SB441

Alternative payment programs: reimbursement.

CA AB2063

California Financing Law: PACE program administrators.

LA HB1062

Requires certain contracting entities to submit information to the commissioner of administration prior to contracting with a state agency or receiving monies (OR +$60,000 GF EX See Note)

CA SB1224

Property Assessed Clean Energy program.