Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB539

Introduced
1/21/22  

Caption

Historic Revitalization Tax Credit - Alterations - Qualified Rehabilitation Expenditures for Single-Family, Owner-Occupied Residences

Impact

The proposed amendments within HB 539 would influence the state's fiscal framework by allowing residents more substantial tax rebates for specific expenditures, thus potentially increasing state revenue losses. By altering the tax credit percentages, the bill strives to bolster the residential sector of historic preservation further. As a result, more households could restore or maintain their properties, leading to positive ripple effects in local neighborhoods through beautification and increased property values. These enhancements could also foster greater community engagement in preservation efforts and stimulate local economies through construction and renovation work.

Summary

House Bill 539 aims to amend the existing Historic Revitalization Tax Credit program in Maryland, specifically concerning the maximum tax credit available for expenditures related to the rehabilitation of single-family, owner-occupied residences. The bill proposes an increase in the tax credit percentage that homeowners can claim for qualified rehabilitation expenditures, enhancing the incentive for property owners to undertake necessary improvements and restorations on historic structures. This change is significant as it encourages the upkeep of residential properties that may hold historical value, thereby promoting cultural heritage preservation.

Contention

Discussions around HB 539 could evoke varying perspectives on the implications of increased financial incentives for historic preservation. Supporters argue that promoting owner-occupied renovations to historic homes will lead to enriched community aesthetics and potentially raise property values. On the contrary, detractors might express concerns regarding the sustainability of state tax revenues and the prioritization of tax benefits for property owners over potentially other pressing community needs. Additionally, ensuring eligibility for the credits and defining what constitutes qualified rehabilitation expenditures could lead to debates regarding the criteria and execution of the tax credit program.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CO HB1314

Modification Tax Credit Preservation Historic Structures

MD SB952

Historic Revitalization Tax Credit – Credit Amounts and Funding – Alterations

MI HB5886

Economic development: obsolete property and rehabilitation; obsolete property rehabilitation act; modify. Amends secs. 2 & 3 of 2000 PA 146 (MCL 125.2782 & 125.2783).

MI HB6172

Economic development: commercial redevelopment; establishment of a commercial rehabilitation district; modify. Amends secs. 2 & 3 of 2005 PA 210 (MCL 207.842 & 207.843).

MI SB0619

Economic development: other; qualified local governmental unit; modify to include county seats. Amends secs. 2 & 16 of 2000 PA 146 (MCL 125.2782 & 125.2796).

MI HB6203

Economic development: obsolete property and rehabilitation; definition of qualified retail food establishment; revise to reflect change in obsolete property rehabilitation act. Amends sec. 2 of 2005 PA 210 (MCL 207.842).

CA AB924

Alameda Health System: hospital authority.

MD HB202

Historic Revitalization Tax Credit – Substantial Rehabilitation – Threshold Amount