Maryland House Bill HB595

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/22
• Refer: 1/31/22
• Report Pass: 4/8/22
• Engrossed: 4/11/22
• Refer: 4/11/22

Caption

Department of the Environment - Supplemental Environmental Projects Database

Impact

This legislation is expected to enhance the accountability of environmental violators and promote community involvement by soliciting input from disadvantaged communities affected by environmental stressors. By implementing a structured approach to supplemental environmental projects, HB595 aims to improve the state's efforts in addressing environmental damage and promoting restoration in affected areas. This could lead to more feasible environmental enhancements being carried out in communities that experience the negative impacts of violations.

Summary

House Bill 595, titled the 'Department of the Environment – Supplemental Environmental Projects Database', mandates the Maryland Department of the Environment to establish a database of supplemental environmental projects. These projects are environmentally beneficial endeavors chosen by alleged violators during settlement negotiations related to enforcement actions. The bill requires the Department to prioritize projects located in the geographic area of the alleged violation and ensure that project scope and costs are aligned with the nature of the violation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB595 appears to be generally positive, particularly among environmental advocates who view it as a progressive step toward mitigating environmental harm and enhancing community welfare. Supporters appreciate the focus on prioritizing impacted areas for project placement and the incorporation of community feedback in decision-making processes. However, some stakeholders may have concerns regarding the limitations placed on project choices and whether the database adequately addresses all community needs.

Contention

While the bill has garnered broad support for its intentions, debates may arise around how effectively the Department of the Environment will implement the database and the criteria for project selection. Critics could argue that the process might face bureaucratic challenges or that the database may not encompass all viable projects. Additionally, there may be discussions about the extent of community input and whether it will truly influence the selection of projects or merely serve as a formality.