Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | 4 | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | - | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | - | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | - | amendment. | |
8 | 5 | *hb0595* | |
9 | 6 | ||
10 | 7 | HOUSE BILL 595 | |
11 | 8 | M3 2lr2615 | |
12 | 9 | CF SB 90 | |
13 | 10 | By: Delegate Mangione | |
14 | 11 | Introduced and read first time: January 31, 2022 | |
15 | 12 | Assigned to: Environment and Transportation | |
16 | - | Committee Report: Favorable | |
17 | - | House action: Adopted | |
18 | - | Read second time: March 31, 2022 | |
19 | 13 | ||
20 | - | ||
14 | + | A BILL ENTITLED | |
21 | 15 | ||
22 | 16 | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
23 | 17 | ||
24 | 18 | Department of the Environment – Supplemental Environmental Projects 2 | |
25 | 19 | Database 3 | |
26 | 20 | ||
27 | 21 | FOR the purpose of requiring the Department of the Environment to create and maintain 4 | |
28 | 22 | a database of supplemental environmental projects that the Department may 5 | |
29 | 23 | consider for implementation as part of a settlement of an enforcement action; 6 | |
30 | 24 | requiring the Department to prioritize the selection of a supplemental 7 | |
31 | 25 | environmental project located in the same geographic area as the alleged violation 8 | |
32 | 26 | and to ensure that the scope and cost of a chosen project meet certain criteria; and 9 | |
33 | 27 | generally relating to a supplemental environmental projects database. 10 | |
34 | 28 | ||
35 | 29 | BY adding to 11 | |
36 | 30 | Article – Environment 12 | |
37 | 31 | Section 1–306 13 | |
38 | 32 | Annotated Code of Maryland 14 | |
39 | 33 | (2013 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 15 | |
40 | 34 | ||
41 | 35 | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 16 | |
42 | 36 | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 17 | |
43 | 37 | ||
44 | 38 | Article – Environment 18 | |
45 | 39 | ||
46 | 40 | 1–306. 19 | |
47 | 41 | ||
48 | - | (A) IN THIS SECTION, “SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRON MENTAL PROJECT ” MEANS 20 2 HOUSE BILL 595 | |
42 | + | (A) IN THIS SECTION, “SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRON MENTAL PROJECT ” MEANS 20 | |
43 | + | AN ENVIRONMENTALLY B ENEFICIAL PROJECT OR ACT IVITY THAT IS NOT RE QUIRED 21 | |
44 | + | BY LAW BUT THAT AN A LLEGED VIOLATOR AGRE ES TO UNDERTAKE AS P ART OF A 22 | |
45 | + | SETTLEMENT OR ENFORC EMENT ACTION . 23 | |
46 | + | ||
47 | + | (B) (1) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE 24 2 HOUSE BILL 595 | |
49 | 48 | ||
50 | 49 | ||
51 | - | ||
52 | - | ||
53 | - | SETTLEMENT | |
50 | + | DEPARTMENT SHALL CREA TE AND MAINTAIN A DA TABASE OF SUPPLEMENTAL 1 | |
51 | + | ENVIRONMENTAL PROJEC TS THAT THE DEPARTMENT MAY CONSID ER FOR 2 | |
52 | + | IMPLEMENTATION AS PA RT OF A SETTLEMENT O F AN ENFORCEMENT ACT ION. 3 | |
54 | 53 | ||
55 | - | ||
56 | - | DEPARTMENT SHALL | |
57 | - | ||
58 | - | ||
54 | + | (2) IN CREATING AND MAINT AINING THE DATABASE , THE 4 | |
55 | + | DEPARTMENT SHALL SOLI CIT INPUT FROM COMMU NITIES IN THE STATE THAT ARE 5 | |
56 | + | OVERBURDENED , UNDERSERVED , OR OTHERWISE DISADVA NTAGED BY 6 | |
57 | + | ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS ORS. 7 | |
59 | 58 | ||
60 | - | ( | |
61 | - | ||
62 | - | ||
63 | - | ||
59 | + | (C) (1) THE DEPARTMENT MAY , WITH REASONABLE JUST IFICATION, 8 | |
60 | + | CONSIDER A SUPPLEMEN TAL ENVIRONMENTAL PR OJECT THAT IS NOT IN CLUDED IN 9 | |
61 | + | THE DATABASE REQUIRE D IN SUBSECTIO N (B) OF THIS SECTION AS P ART OF A 10 | |
62 | + | SETTLEMENT OF AN ENF ORCEMENT ACTION . 11 | |
64 | 63 | ||
65 | - | (C) (1) THE DEPARTMENT MAY , WITH REASONABLE JUST IFICATION, 12 | |
66 | - | CONSIDER A SUPPLEMEN TAL ENVIRONMENTAL PR OJECT THAT IS NOT IN CLUDED IN 13 | |
67 | - | THE DATABASE REQUIRE D IN SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION AS P ART OF A 14 | |
68 | - | SETTLEMENT OF AN ENF ORCEMENT ACTION . 15 | |
64 | + | (2) THE DEPARTMENT MAY NOT CH OOSE A SUPPLEMENTAL 12 | |
65 | + | ENVIRONMENTAL PROJEC T OFFERED BY THE VIO LATOR UNLESS THE DEPARTMENT : 13 | |
69 | 66 | ||
70 | - | (2) THE DEPARTMENT MAY NOT CH OOSE A SUPPLEMENTAL 16 | |
71 | - | ENVIRONMENTAL PROJEC T OFFERED BY THE VIO LATOR UNLESS THE DEPARTMENT : 17 | |
67 | + | (I) APPROVES THE PROJECT ; AND 14 | |
72 | 68 | ||
73 | - | ( | |
69 | + | (II) MAINTAINS DOCUMENTAT ION OF THE APPROVAL . 15 | |
74 | 70 | ||
75 | - | (II) MAINTAINS DOCUMENTATI ON OF THE APPROVAL . 19 | |
71 | + | (D) BEFORE A VIOLATOR UND ERTAKES A SUPPLEMENT AL ENVIRONMENTAL 16 | |
72 | + | PROJECT, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL : 17 | |
76 | 73 | ||
77 | - | (D) BEFORE A VIOLATOR UND ERTAKES A SUPPLEMENT AL ENVIRONMENTAL 20 | |
78 | - | PROJECT, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL : 21 | |
74 | + | (1) GIVE PRIORITY CONSIDE RATION TO THE SELECT ION OF A 18 | |
75 | + | PROJECT LOCATED IN T HE SAME GEOGRAPHIC A REA IMPACTED BY THE ALLEGED 19 | |
76 | + | VIOLATION; AND 20 | |
79 | 77 | ||
80 | - | (1) GIVE PRIORITY CONSIDE RATION TO THE SELECT ION OF A 22 | |
81 | - | PROJECT LOCATED IN T HE SAME GEOGRAPHIC A REA IMPACTED BY THE ALLEGED 23 | |
82 | - | VIOLATION; AND 24 | |
78 | + | (2) ENSURE THAT THE SCOPE AND C OST OF THE CHOSEN PR OJECT IS 21 | |
79 | + | REASONABLY RELATED T O THE NEXUS OF THE V IOLATION OR THE ADVE RSE IMPACT 22 | |
80 | + | OF THE VIOLATION AND THAT THE COST IS SUF FICIENT TO ALLOW THE 23 | |
81 | + | DEPARTMENT AND THE AL LEGED VIOLATOR TO RE ACH A SETTLEMENT . 24 | |
83 | 82 | ||
84 | - | (2) ENSURE THAT THE SCOPE AND C OST OF THE CHOSEN PR OJECT IS 25 | |
85 | - | REASONABLY RELATED T O THE NEXUS OF THE V IOLATION OR THE ADVE RSE IMPACT 26 | |
86 | - | OF THE VIOLATION AND THAT THE COST IS SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW THE 27 | |
87 | - | DEPARTMENT AND THE AL LEGED VIOLATOR TO RE ACH A SETTLEMENT . 28 | |
88 | - | ||
89 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 29 | |
90 | - | October 1, 2022. 30 | |
83 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 25 | |
84 | + | October 1, 2022. 26 | |
91 | 85 | ||
92 | 86 |