Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB971

Introduced
2/10/22  
Refer
2/10/22  
Report Pass
3/18/22  
Engrossed
3/21/22  
Refer
3/21/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Enrolled
4/11/22  
Chaptered
5/12/22  

Caption

Maryland Medical Assistance Program - Substance Use Disorder Treatment - Network Adequacy

Impact

The enactment of HB 971 significantly influences Maryland state law by establishing more rigorous standards for mental health service delivery through managed care organizations. The bill enforces the creation of a robust system ensuring that children have access to specialized care. It sets forth crucial performance standards and procedures that managed care providers must follow, thereby aiming to standardize the quality of care across different service providers. This is expected to enhance overall young people's mental health by ensuring they receive necessary assistance without undue delays or barriers.

Summary

House Bill 971, concerning the Maryland Medical Assistance Program, aims to enhance the delivery network for substance use disorder treatment specifically for children under the age of 18. The bill mandates that the Maryland Department of Health and the Behavioral Health Administration ensure an adequate network of providers to offer essential alcohol and drug abuse treatment. This initiative addresses a critical gap in healthcare services, emphasizing the importance of providing young individuals with timely and appropriate treatment options for substance use disorders.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 971 appears to be largely positive, reflecting a collective recognition of the pressing need for improved substance abuse treatment for youth. Stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and lawmakers, have voiced support for the bill, viewing it as a proactive measure to safeguard the health of vulnerable populations. However, some concerns may linger regarding the practical implementation of the bill and whether existing systems will adapt quickly to meet the outlined requirements.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, points of contention likely focus on the capacity of the current healthcare infrastructure to meet the new demands. Critics may argue about the potential strains on providers and funding, questioning whether the necessary resources are available to ensure compliance with the mandated network adequacy. Additionally, discussions may arise concerning the execution of quality assurance protocols and how effectively they will be monitored over time, highlighting the importance of accountability in the delivery of mental health services.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1490

Food delivery platforms.

CA AB1360

Third-party food delivery.

CA SB254

Delivery network companies: deliveries of alcoholic beverages.

CA AB1424

Occupational safety and health: cannabis delivery employee.

AR HB1585

To Create The Delivery Network Company Insurance Act.

CA AB375

Food delivery platforms: disclosure of delivery drivers’ identity.

KY HB280

AN ACT relating to delivery services.

CA AB578

Food delivery platforms: customer service.