Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB489

Introduced
1/27/22  
Refer
1/27/22  
Report Pass
2/22/22  
Engrossed
2/24/22  
Refer
2/25/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Report Pass
4/6/22  
Enrolled
4/7/22  
Chaptered
4/12/22  

Caption

Queen Anne's County - Public Safety - Buildings Used for Agritourism

Impact

This legislation is set to impact local laws by allowing for greater ease of operation for agritourism businesses in Queen Anne's County. By exempting agricultural buildings from extensive building performance standards and permitting requirements, the bill may foster a more supportive environment for agritourism-related activities. This could lead to increased economic activity in the region, potentially benefiting local farmers and small businesses engaging in agritourism.

Summary

Senate Bill 489 addresses the regulations pertaining to agricultural buildings used for agritourism specifically in Queen Anne’s County. The bill aims to exempt such structures from certain building performance standards, thereby streamlining the process for agritourism ventures within this region. One significant aspect of the bill is that existing agricultural buildings that serve an agritourism purpose would not be classified as a 'change of occupancy,' removing the requirement for additional building permits under specified conditions, such as occupancy limits and structural compliance.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB489 appears positive, with an emphasis on promoting local agritourism initiatives and reducing bureaucratic hurdles. Lawmakers and stakeholders see the bill as a favorable move toward enhancing the economic viability of agritourism in Queen Anne’s County. However, there may be contention surrounding safety concerns and the adequacy of the building regulations being relaxed, particularly regarding public safety in accommodating larger groups.

Contention

Notable points of contention focus on the balance between promoting economic growth through agritourism and maintaining structural and safety standards. Critics may argue that reducing permit requirements poses risks related to public safety, particularly in scenarios where buildings exceed original agricultural functions. Additionally, the criteria under which occupancy limits apply raises questions about the adequacy of space for patrons and the overall safety of structures under agritourism use.

Companion Bills

MD HB586

Crossfiled Queen Anne's County - Public Safety - Buildings Used for Agritourism

Similar Bills

CA AB2635

California Agritourism Liability Act: agritourism civil liability.

CA SB1479

California Agritourism Promotion Act: agritourism civil liability.

MS SB2264

Agritourism activity; amend provisions pertaining to.

MS HB1295

Agritourism activity; revise definition of and clarify posting of signage for liability purposes.

IL SB0349

AGRITOURISM LIABILITY ACT

TX HB1203

Relating to limited liability for an agritourism entity involved in an agritourism activity.

TX SB610

Relating to limited liability for an agritourism entity involved in an agritourism activity.

NJ A2631

Provides limited civil liability immunity to farmers hosting agritourism activities.