Public Utilities - Underground Facilities - One-Call System
The introduction of SB 789 is poised to enhance safety standards concerning underground facilities, reducing accidental damages during excavation processes, which could pose risks not only to property but also to public safety. By requiring a clearly defined timeline for notification and participation in the safe marking of underground utilities, the bill aims to improve communication among utility owners and contractors involved in construction activities. This should ultimately lead to a decrease in infrastructure damages and related disruptions.
Senate Bill 789, titled 'Public Utilities - Underground Facilities - One-Call System', addresses the protocols surrounding excavation and demolition activities regarding underground utilities. This legislation mandates that individuals or entities must notify a specified one-call system before engaging in any excavation or demolition work. Notably, it requires that a start work date be specified, ensuring organizations can prepare adequately before the excavation begins. Additionally, the bill restructures the existing system's parameters, detailing the necessary information that must be reported to the one-call system and the time frames in which different parties must respond and act.
The sentiment surrounding SB 789 has echoed a strong general support from various stakeholders, including utility companies and construction firms, as it streamlines processes and clarifies responsibilities. However, there exists a degree of contention regarding the potential burdens it may impose on smaller contractors who may find it challenging to comply with the strict timelines and reporting requirements. Overall, the bill has gained bipartisan support, reflecting an shared understanding of the importance of safety in construction and utility management.
Critics of SB 789 raised concerns about the practicality of the new regulations, particularly the feasibility for smaller companies to adhere to the new start work date requirements. Some stakeholders worry that the bill may inadvertently favor larger firms that possess the resources to comply with such regulations while placing additional burdens on smaller operations. As conversations evolved around the bill, discussions have also touched upon how these changes may affect the administrative workload for existing one-call systems and whether they are adequately prepared to handle the increased volume of requests.