Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB1141

Introduced
2/10/23  
Refer
2/10/23  
Report Pass
3/17/23  
Engrossed
3/20/23  

Caption

State Information Technology - Prohibited Applications and Websites

Impact

If enacted, HB 1141 will significantly affect the operation of information technology across state government units. No unit will be allowed to have TikTok or WeChat installed or maintained on their devices, nor access their services while using state-operated internet networks. Exceptions are outlined for situations involving law enforcement activities, national security protections, or research related to security practices. This legislative measure reflects a growing trend in state policies aimed at mitigating perceived risks associated with foreign technology companies.

Summary

House Bill 1141 addresses the use of specific social media applications, explicitly prohibiting the installation or maintenance of TikTok on state government information technology. The bill defines TikTok as the video-sharing application created by Bytedance Ltd., and also includes WeChat, developed by Tencent Holdings Ltd. The legislation aims to restrict access to these applications and associated websites by state employees and contractors, citing concerns over data privacy and national security. The bill requires the Department of Budget and Management to create guidelines for compliance by December 31, 2023.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1141 appears largely in favor among its supporters, emphasizing the need for protective measures concerning sensitive state data and potential cybersecurity threats. However, there may be dissent regarding the limitations this bill places on communication tools that some find essential. Critics may argue about the implications of restricting access to widely-used applications, along with concerns about censorship or undue influence from government regulations.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HB 1141 include the debate over data privacy versus technological accessibility. Proponents of the bill advocate for the protection of state information from surveillance or misuse, while opponents might argue that prohibiting popular applications can hamper communication and efficiency. Furthermore, the emphasis on foreign companies raises discussions on the broader landscape of American technology regulation and the potential overreach of governmental authority in citizens’ communications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MD HB617

State Information Technology - Prohibited Applications and Websites

MD SB757

State Information Technology - Prohibited Applications and Websites

MD SB1459

Administration of state government; prohibited applications and websites.

MD HB1188

Information Technology - Modernization of Information Technology Projects

MD SB982

Information Technology - Modernization of Information Technology Projects

MD HB419

State Government - Information Technology - Cybersecurity

MD HB227

State Government - Information Technology - Major Information Technology Development Projects

MD SB294

State Government - Information Technology - Major Information Technology Development Projects

MD SB390

State Government - Information Technology - Cybersecurity

MD SB818

Information Technology - Artificial Intelligence - Policies and Procedures (Artificial Intelligence Governance Act of 2024)

Similar Bills

AZ SB1156

Blockchain technology; tax; fee; prohibition

AZ SB1236

Blockchain technology; tax; fee; prohibition

AZ SB1015

Blockchain technology; tax; fee; prohibition

AZ SB1127

Blockchain technology; tax; fee; prohibition

AZ HB2696

Critical Infrastructure; foreign adversary; prohibition

CA AB1680

California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018.

HI HR175

Requesting The Department Of Transportation To Adopt Or Amend Administrative Rules To Prohibit The Installation Or Deployment Of Facilities That Use Fifth-generation Cellular Network Technology, Or 5g Technology, Near State Airports And Navigational Equipment.

HI HCR175

Requesting The Department Of Transportation To Adopt Or Amend Administrative Rules To Prohibit The Installation Or Deployment Of Facilities That Use Fifth-generation Cellular Network Technology, Or 5g Technology, Near State Airports And Navigational Equipment.