Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB382

Introduced
1/26/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Report Pass
3/13/23  
Engrossed
3/15/23  
Refer
3/16/23  
Report Pass
4/3/23  
Enrolled
4/5/23  
Chaptered
4/24/23  

Caption

Maryland Department of Health and Prescription Drug Affordability Board - Managed Care Organizations and Prescription Drug Claims - Study

Impact

If enacted, HB 382 will establish clearer guidelines regarding reimbursement levels that pharmacy benefits managers must adhere to. This will likely enable better financial conditions for retail pharmacies, thereby potentially encouraging more pharmacies to participate in providing services under the Maryland Medical Assistance Program. Furthermore, the bill instructs the Maryland Department of Health and the Prescription Drug Affordability Board to conduct a comprehensive study regarding past reimbursement practices and their financial impacts on pharmacies in 2021 and 2022.

Summary

House Bill 382 focuses on the regulation of pharmacy benefits administration under the Maryland Medical Assistance Program, specifically concerning reimbursement rates for pharmacies. The bill mandates that reimbursement levels for drug products must be at least equal to the National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) plus a professional dispensing fee, in order to enhance fairness and consistency in drug pricing. This initiative aims to improve accessibility and affordability of prescription medications for Maryland residents, particularly through managed care organizations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 382 appears to be generally positive among legislators focused on healthcare affordability and access. Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to alleviate financial strains on pharmacies, which have been adversely affected by previous reimbursement policies. Nonetheless, the bill does face scrutiny from some stakeholders concerned about the implications for managed care organizations and the potential costs this may impose on state healthcare programs.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around the financial implications for managed care organizations, which may be tasked with adjusting to new reimbursement rates that could affect their overall budgets and operations. Opponents may argue that this could lead to increases in premiums for consumers or strain on state resources, as the bill seeks to enforce minimum reimbursement requirements that may not have been financially feasible prior. Additionally, the bill's impact on mail-order pharmacies — which are exempt from certain provisions — raises questions regarding equitable access to pharmacy services across different types of providers.

Companion Bills

MD SB895

Crossfiled Pharmacy Benefits Administration - Maryland Medical Assistance Program and Pharmacy Benefits Managers

Similar Bills

MD HB813

Maryland Insurance Administration and Maryland Department of Health - Workgroup to Study Pharmacy Benefits Managers

MD HB755

Pharmacy Benefits Managers - Prohibited Actions

MD SB689

Pharmacy Benefits Managers - Prohibited Actions

MD HB539

Pharmacy Benefits Managers - Prohibited Actions

MD SB896

Pharmacy Benefits Managers - Prohibited Actions

MD HB1009

Health Insurance - Pharmacy Benefits Managers - Reimbursement and Cost Sharing

MD SB62

Pharmacists - Nicotine Replacement Therapy Medication

MD HB28

Pharmacists - Nicotine Replacement Therapy Medication