Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB926

Introduced
2/16/23  
Refer
2/16/23  

Caption

County Boards of Education - Due Process Proceedings for Children With Disabilities - Burden of Proof

Impact

The enactment of SB926 is expected to significantly influence how disputes between parents and education boards are resolved. By placing the onus of proof on the education boards, this bill supports parents by making it more challenging for boards to deny claims related to the provision of adequate education. This change aligns with federal guidelines regarding the education of children with disabilities, aiming to enhance protections for these students and their families. The bill reinforces the commitment to ensuring that children receive educational benefits consistent with the law.

Summary

Senate Bill 926 requires county boards of education in Maryland to bear the burden of proof in due process proceedings that arise from complaints regarding the provision of special education services for children with disabilities. This law aims to ensure that parents have a clear path when addressing disputes about their child's educational needs, shifting the responsibility of proving adequacy and compliance from the parents to the school boards. The legislation specifically details conditions under which this burden may shift back to parents, particularly in cases where parents unilaterally place their children in nonpublic schools and seek reimbursement for tuition.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support from advocates for children with disabilities and their families, there are concerns regarding its impact on school boards. Some argue that shifting the burden of proof could lead to increased litigation and resource strain on local education agencies. Additionally, there are fears that this legislation may potentially foster a climate of inconsistency in how cases are handled, as educational boards work to develop responsive policies against this heightened standard. Balancing parental rights with the operational realities of school systems will likely be a point of ongoing discussion.

Companion Bills

MD HB294

Crossfiled County Boards of Education - Due Process Proceedings for Children With Disabilities - Burden of Proof

Previously Filed As

MD HB294

County Boards of Education - Due Process Proceedings for Children With Disabilities - Burden of Proof

MD HB120

Harford County - Due Process Proceedings for Children With Disabilities - Burden of Proof

MD HB865

Howard County – Due Process Proceedings for Children With Disabilities – Burden of Proof Ho. Co. 02-22

MD HB373

Howard County – Due Process Proceedings for Children With Disabilities – Burden of Proof Ho. Co. 2–23

MD HB381

Baltimore City and Baltimore County – Due Process Proceedings for Children With Disabilities – Burden of Proof

MD HB197

Children with disabilities; provides certain procedures to attempt to remedy an allegation of a violation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act before an impartial due process hearing may be requested

MD S0180

Children With Disabilities

MD H5772

Children With Disabilities

MD SB560

Relating to advocates for children with disabilities in public schools.

MD AB81

Indian children: child custody proceedings.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2391

Video services providers; enforcement; jurisdiction

CA AB1651

Community colleges: academic employees: involuntary administrative leave.

LA HB900

Provides relative to complaints regarding government service (OR +$1,267,177 GF EX See Note)

CA SB218

Employment: discrimination enforcement: local government.

CA AB1905

Public postsecondary education: employment: settlements, informal resolutions, and retreat rights.

TX SB10

Relating to the prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.

TX HB1690

Relating to the investigation and prosecution of offenses against public administration, including ethics offenses.

TX HB680

Relating to complaints filed with the Texas Medical Board.