Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 649 | |
2 | 1 | ||
3 | - | – 1 – | |
4 | - | Chapter 649 | |
5 | - | (House Bill 1507) | |
6 | 2 | ||
7 | - | AN ACT concerning | |
3 | + | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | + | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | + | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | + | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | + | amendment. | |
8 | + | *hb1507* | |
8 | 9 | ||
9 | - | Transportation – Major Change in Bus Service – Impacts Report Publication on | |
10 | - | Website | |
10 | + | HOUSE BILL 1507 | |
11 | + | R2 4lr3422 | |
12 | + | CF SB 70 | |
13 | + | By: Delegate Addison Delegates Addison, Lehman, Ruth, and Terrasa | |
14 | + | Introduced and read first time: February 21, 2024 | |
15 | + | Assigned to: Rules and Executive Nominations | |
16 | + | Re–referred to: Environment and Transportation, March 5, 2024 | |
17 | + | Committee Report: Favorable with amendments | |
18 | + | House action: Adopted | |
19 | + | Read second time: March 17, 2024 | |
11 | 20 | ||
12 | - | FOR the purpose of requiring the Maryland Transit Administration, before announcing any | |
13 | - | reduction or cancellation of an existing bus route or line, to compile a report on the | |
14 | - | impacts of the proposed service reduction or cancellation; requiring the | |
15 | - | Administration to publish the report on its website at least a certain number of days | |
16 | - | before the required public hearing on the proposed service change altering the | |
17 | - | information that the Maryland Transit Administration is required to publish on its | |
18 | - | website before holding a public hearing on a major service change; requiring the | |
19 | - | Administration to distribute the report a certain report on proposed major service | |
20 | - | changes to certain officials and entities; and generally relating to service reductions | |
21 | - | or cancellations of major service changes for existing bus routes. | |
21 | + | CHAPTER ______ | |
22 | 22 | ||
23 | - | BY adding to repealing and reenacting, with amendments, | |
24 | - | Article – Transportation | |
25 | - | Section 7–508 7–716 | |
26 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland | |
27 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) | |
28 | - | (As enacted by Chapters 583 and 584 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2023) | |
23 | + | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
29 | 24 | ||
30 | - | ||
31 | - | ||
25 | + | Transportation – Major Change in Bus Service – Impacts Report Publication on 2 | |
26 | + | Website 3 | |
32 | 27 | ||
33 | - | Article – Transportation | |
28 | + | FOR the purpose of requiring the Maryland Transit Administration, before announcing any 4 | |
29 | + | reduction or cancellation of an existing bus route or line, to compile a report on the 5 | |
30 | + | impacts of the proposed service reduction or cancellation; requiring the 6 | |
31 | + | Administration to publish the report on its website at least a certain number of days 7 | |
32 | + | before the required public hearing on the proposed service change altering the 8 | |
33 | + | information that the Maryland Transit Administration is required to publish on its 9 | |
34 | + | website before holding a public hearing on a major service change; requiring the 10 | |
35 | + | Administration to distribute the report a certain report on proposed major service 11 | |
36 | + | changes to certain officials and entities; and generally relating to service reductions 12 | |
37 | + | or cancellations of major service changes for existing bus routes. 13 | |
34 | 38 | ||
35 | - | 7–508. | |
39 | + | BY adding to repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 14 | |
40 | + | Article – Transportation 15 | |
41 | + | Section 7–508 7–716 16 | |
42 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 17 | |
43 | + | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 18 | |
44 | + | (As enacted by Chapters 583 and 584 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2023) 19 | |
36 | 45 | ||
37 | - | (A) IN THIS SECTION, “ROUTE” MEANS A BUS ROUTE OR BUS LINE. | |
46 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 20 | |
47 | + | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 21 | |
48 | + | 2 HOUSE BILL 1507 | |
38 | 49 | ||
39 | - | (B) BEFORE ANNOUNCING ANY SERVICE REDUCTION OR CANCELLATION OF | |
40 | - | AN EXISTING ROUTE , THE ADMINISTRATION SHALL COMPILE A REPORT ON THE | |
41 | - | IMPACTS OF THE PROPO SED SERVICE REDUCTIO N OR CANCELLATION TH AT | |
42 | - | INCLUDES: | |
43 | 50 | ||
44 | - | ||
51 | + | Article – Transportation 1 | |
45 | 52 | ||
46 | - | ||
53 | + | 7–508. 2 | |
47 | 54 | ||
48 | - | | |
55 | + | (A) IN THIS SECTION, “ROUTE” MEANS A BUS ROUTE OR BUS LINE. 3 | |
49 | 56 | ||
50 | - | – 2 – | |
57 | + | (B) BEFORE ANNOUNCING ANY SERVICE REDUCTION OR CANCELLATION OF 4 | |
58 | + | AN EXISTING ROUTE , THE ADMINISTRATION SHALL COMPILE A REPORT ON THE 5 | |
59 | + | IMPACTS OF THE PROPO SED SERVICE REDUCTION OR CANCELL ATION THAT 6 | |
60 | + | INCLUDES: 7 | |
51 | 61 | ||
52 | - | | |
62 | + | (1) INFORMATION ON THE RO UTE, INCLUDING A DESCRIPT ION OF: 8 | |
53 | 63 | ||
54 | - | ( | |
64 | + | (I) THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF : 9 | |
55 | 65 | ||
56 | - | | |
66 | + | 1. THE RIDERS ON THE ROU TE; AND 10 | |
57 | 67 | ||
58 | - | | |
68 | + | 2. THE SERVICE AREA ; 11 | |
59 | 69 | ||
60 | - | (V) THE EFFECT THAT THE S ERVICE REDUCTION OR | |
61 | - | CANCELLATION WOULD H AVE ON THE COMMUTES OF RIDERS ON THE ROU TE; | |
70 | + | (II) THE SCHOOLS IN THE SE RVICE AREA; 12 | |
62 | 71 | ||
63 | - | (2) A DESCRIPTION OF THE C ONTENTS OF ANY MINUT ES, RECORDS, | |
64 | - | OR DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE SERVICE REDUC TION OR CANCELLATION ; AND | |
72 | + | (III) THE TYPES OF BUSINESSES IN THE SERVICE AREA; 13 | |
65 | 73 | ||
66 | - | (3) A BRIEF STATEMENT EXPL AINING THE REASON FO R THE SERVICE | |
67 | - | REDUCTION OR CANCELL ATION. | |
74 | + | (IV) THE MONTHLY RIDERSHIP ON THE ROUTE ; AND 14 | |
68 | 75 | ||
69 | - | ( | |
70 | - | ||
76 | + | (V) THE EFFECT THAT THE S ERVICE REDUCTION OR 15 | |
77 | + | CANCELLATION WOULD H AVE ON THE COMMUTES OF RIDERS ON THE ROU TE; 16 | |
71 | 78 | ||
72 | - | ( | |
73 | - | ||
79 | + | (2) A DESCRIPTION OF THE C ONTENTS OF ANY MINUT ES, RECORDS, 17 | |
80 | + | OR DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE SERVICE REDUC TION OR CANCELLATION ; AND 18 | |
74 | 81 | ||
75 | - | (2) DISTRIBUTE THE REPORT TO: | |
82 | + | (3) A BRIEF STATEMENT EXPL AINING THE REASON FO R THE SERVICE 19 | |
83 | + | REDUCTION OR CANCELL ATION. 20 | |
76 | 84 | ||
77 | - | (I) THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION ; AND | |
85 | + | (C) AT LEAST 30 DAYS BEFORE THE PUBL IC HEARING REQUIRED UNDER § 21 | |
86 | + | 7–506 OF THIS SUBTITLE , THE ADMINISTRATION SHALL : 22 | |
78 | 87 | ||
79 | - | ( | |
80 | - | ||
88 | + | (1) PUBLISH THE REPORT ON THE ADMINISTRATION ’S WEBSITE WITH 23 | |
89 | + | A VISIBLE LINK IDENT IFYING THE IMPACTED ROUTE ON THE PRIMARY PAGE; AND 24 | |
81 | 90 | ||
82 | - | | |
91 | + | (2) DISTRIBUTE THE REPORT TO: 25 | |
83 | 92 | ||
84 | - | 2. THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE; | |
93 | + | (I) THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION ; AND 26 | |
94 | + | HOUSE BILL 1507 3 | |
85 | 95 | ||
86 | - | 3. THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE; | |
87 | 96 | ||
88 | - | | |
89 | - | ||
97 | + | (II) IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 2–1257 OF THE STATE 1 | |
98 | + | GOVERNMENT ARTICLE: 2 | |
90 | 99 | ||
91 | - | 5. EACH MEMBER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHOSE | |
92 | - | DISTRICT WOULD BE IM PACTED BY THE PROPOSED SERVICE RED UCTION OR | |
93 | - | CANCELLATION OF THE ROUTE. | |
94 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 649 | |
100 | + | 1. THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE; 3 | |
95 | 101 | ||
96 | - | – 3 – | |
97 | - | 7–716. | |
102 | + | 2. THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE; 4 | |
98 | 103 | ||
99 | - | (a) Before announcing any service change that would constitute a major service | |
100 | - | change under the Federal Transit Administration’s Title VI Requirements and Guidelines | |
101 | - | for Federal Transit Administration Recipients, the Department, in collaboration with the | |
102 | - | Administration, shall: | |
104 | + | 3. THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE; 5 | |
103 | 105 | ||
104 | - | (1) Conduct a transit equity analysis in accordance with the federal | |
105 | - | Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act and the federal Rehabilitation Act of | |
106 | - | 1973 as amended to determine whether the change will create a disparate impact on | |
107 | - | persons with disabilities; | |
106 | + | 4. THE HOUSE ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 6 | |
107 | + | COMMITTEE; AND 7 | |
108 | 108 | ||
109 | - | | |
110 | - | ||
111 | - | ||
109 | + | 5. EACH MEMBER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHOSE 8 | |
110 | + | DISTRICT WOULD BE IM PACTED BY THE PROPOS ED SERVICE REDUCTION OR 9 | |
111 | + | CANCELLATION OF THE ROUTE. 10 | |
112 | 112 | ||
113 | - | ||
113 | + | 7–716. 11 | |
114 | 114 | ||
115 | - | (i) Economic development; | |
115 | + | (a) Before announcing any service change that would constitute a major service 12 | |
116 | + | change under the Federal Transit Administration’s Title VI Requirements and Guidelines 13 | |
117 | + | for Federal Transit Administration Recipients, the Department, in collaboration with the 14 | |
118 | + | Administration, shall: 15 | |
116 | 119 | ||
117 | - | (ii) Employment; | |
120 | + | (1) Conduct a transit equity analysis in accordance with the federal 16 | |
121 | + | Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act and the federal Rehabilitation Act of 17 | |
122 | + | 1973 as amended to determine whether the change will create a disparate impact on 18 | |
123 | + | persons with disabilities; 19 | |
118 | 124 | ||
119 | - | (iii) Education; | |
125 | + | (2) Conduct a transit equity analysis in accordance with the Title VI 20 | |
126 | + | Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit Administration Recipients to determine 21 | |
127 | + | whether the change will create a disparate impact or a disproportionate burden; 22 | |
120 | 128 | ||
121 | - | ( | |
129 | + | (3) Perform a cost–benefit analysis, including an analysis of impacts on: 23 | |
122 | 130 | ||
123 | - | ( | |
131 | + | (i) Economic development; 24 | |
124 | 132 | ||
125 | - | (4) Consult with members and leaders of affected communities, including | |
126 | - | through community outreach to: | |
133 | + | (ii) Employment; 25 | |
127 | 134 | ||
128 | - | ( | |
135 | + | (iii) Education; 26 | |
129 | 136 | ||
130 | - | ( | |
137 | + | (iv) Health; and 27 | |
131 | 138 | ||
132 | - | ( | |
139 | + | (v) Environmental justice; and 28 | |
133 | 140 | ||
134 | - | (iv) Riders with limited English proficiency; | |
141 | + | (4) Consult with members and leaders of affected communities, including 29 | |
142 | + | through community outreach to: 30 4 HOUSE BILL 1507 | |
135 | 143 | ||
136 | - | (v) Transit–reliant riders; and | |
137 | 144 | ||
138 | - | (vi) Senior riders. | |
139 | 145 | ||
140 | - | (b) (1) If a transit equity analysis reveals disparate impact or disproportionate | |
141 | - | burden, the Administration shall: | |
142 | - | Ch. 649 2024 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
146 | + | (i) Racial minority communities; 1 | |
143 | 147 | ||
144 | - | – 4 – | |
145 | - | (i) Develop alternatives that would meet the goals of the proposed | |
146 | - | service change; and | |
148 | + | (ii) Low–income communities; 2 | |
147 | 149 | ||
148 | - | ( | |
150 | + | (iii) Disabled riders; 3 | |
149 | 151 | ||
150 | - | (2) If a disparate impact can be avoided through use of one of the | |
151 | - | alternatives analyzed, the Administration shall proceed with that alternative as the | |
152 | - | primary proposed service change. | |
152 | + | (iv) Riders with limited English proficiency; 4 | |
153 | 153 | ||
154 | - | (3) If there is no alternative that would avoid a disparate impact or | |
155 | - | disproportionate burden, the Administration: | |
154 | + | (v) Transit–reliant riders; and 5 | |
156 | 155 | ||
157 | - | (i) May not implement the proposed service change unless a | |
158 | - | substantial justification exists that necessitates the change; and | |
156 | + | (vi) Senior riders. 6 | |
159 | 157 | ||
160 | - | ( | |
161 | - | ||
158 | + | (b) (1) If a transit equity analysis reveals disparate impact or disproportionate 7 | |
159 | + | burden, the Administration shall: 8 | |
162 | 160 | ||
163 | - | (c) Before holding a public hearing on a proposed service change, the | |
164 | - | Administration shall publish on the Administration’s website WITH A VISIBLE LINK | |
165 | - | IDENTIFYING THE PROP OSED SERVICE CHANGE ON THE PRIMARY PAGE , for the | |
166 | - | routes [or lines], LINES, OR ANY CORRESPONDING PARATRANSIT SERVICE AREA | |
167 | - | impacted by the service change[, an evaluation on the demographics of: | |
161 | + | (i) Develop alternatives that would meet the goals of the proposed 9 | |
162 | + | service change; and 10 | |
168 | 163 | ||
169 | - | ( | |
164 | + | (ii) Conduct a transit equity analysis on the alternatives. 11 | |
170 | 165 | ||
171 | - | (2) The service area]: | |
166 | + | (2) If a disparate impact can be avoided through use of one of the 12 | |
167 | + | alternatives analyzed, the Administration shall proceed with that alternative as the 13 | |
168 | + | primary proposed service change. 14 | |
172 | 169 | ||
173 | - | (1) A DESCRIPTION OF : | |
170 | + | (3) If there is no alternative that would avoid a disparate impact or 15 | |
171 | + | disproportionate burden, the Administration: 16 | |
174 | 172 | ||
175 | - | (I) THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF : | |
173 | + | (i) May not implement the proposed service change unless a 17 | |
174 | + | substantial justification exists that necessitates the change; and 18 | |
176 | 175 | ||
177 | - | | |
178 | - | ||
176 | + | (ii) Shall implement the alternative that causes the least disparate 19 | |
177 | + | impact or disproportionate burden. 20 | |
179 | 178 | ||
180 | - | 2. THE AFFECTED SERVICE AREA; | |
179 | + | (c) Before holding a public hearing on a proposed service change, the 21 | |
180 | + | Administration shall publish on the Administration’s website WITH A VISIBLE LINK 22 | |
181 | + | IDENTIFYING THE PROP OSED SERVICE CHANGE ON THE PRIMARY PAGE , for the 23 | |
182 | + | routes [or lines], LINES, OR ANY CORRESPONDING PARATRANSIT SERVICE AREA 24 | |
183 | + | impacted by the service change[, an evaluation on the demographics of: 25 | |
181 | 184 | ||
182 | - | ( | |
185 | + | (1) The riders of the routes or lines; and 26 | |
183 | 186 | ||
184 | - | (III) THE TYPES OF BUSINESS ES IN THE AFFECTED S ERVICE | |
185 | - | AREA; | |
187 | + | (2) The service area]: 27 | |
186 | 188 | ||
187 | - | (IV) THE MONTHLY RIDERSHIP FOR THE ROUTE , LINE, OR | |
188 | - | SERVICE AREA; AND | |
189 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 649 | |
189 | + | (1) A DESCRIPTION OF : 28 | |
190 | + | HOUSE BILL 1507 5 | |
190 | 191 | ||
191 | - | – 5 – | |
192 | - | (V) THE EFFECT THAT THE P ROPOSED SERVICE CHAN GE | |
193 | - | WOULD HAVE ON: | |
194 | 192 | ||
195 | - | 1. THE COMMUTES OF RIDER S ON THE ROUTE , LINE, OR | |
196 | - | SERVICE AREA; | |
193 | + | (I) THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF : 1 | |
197 | 194 | ||
198 | - | | |
199 | - | AND | |
195 | + | 1. THE RIDERS ON THE AFF ECTED ROUTE , LINE, OR 2 | |
196 | + | PARATRANSIT SERVICE AREA ; AND 3 | |
200 | 197 | ||
201 | - | 3. THE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PARATRANSIT RIDER S | |
202 | - | IMPACTED; | |
198 | + | 2. THE AFFECTED SERVICE AREA; 4 | |
203 | 199 | ||
204 | - | (2) A SUMMARY OF ANY PUBLI CLY AVAILABLE MINUTE S, RECORDS, | |
205 | - | OR DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED SERVICE CHANGE; AND | |
200 | + | (II) THE SCHOOLS IN THE AF FECTED SERVICE AREA ; 5 | |
206 | 201 | ||
207 | - | ( | |
208 | - | ||
202 | + | (III) THE TYPES OF BUSINESS ES IN THE AFFECTED S ERVICE 6 | |
203 | + | AREA; 7 | |
209 | 204 | ||
210 | - | (d) (1) After completing the public hearings, the Administration shall: | |
205 | + | (IV) THE MONTHLY RIDERSHIP FOR THE ROUTE , LINE, OR 8 | |
206 | + | SERVICE AREA; AND 9 | |
211 | 207 | ||
212 | - | ( | |
213 | - | ||
208 | + | (V) THE EFFECT THAT THE P ROPOSED SERVICE CHAN GE 10 | |
209 | + | WOULD HAVE ON : 11 | |
214 | 210 | ||
215 | - | (ii) Compile a report on the impacts of the proposed service change. | |
211 | + | 1. THE COMMUTES OF RIDER S ON THE ROUTE , LINE, OR 12 | |
212 | + | SERVICE AREA; 13 | |
216 | 213 | ||
217 | - | (2) The report shall include: | |
214 | + | 2. THE CORRESPONDING PAR ATRANSIT SERVICE ARE A; 14 | |
215 | + | AND 15 | |
218 | 216 | ||
219 | - | (i) The transit equity analysis; | |
217 | + | 3. THE ESTIMATED NUMBER OF PARATRANSIT RIDER S 16 | |
218 | + | IMPACTED; 17 | |
220 | 219 | ||
221 | - | (ii) The cost–benefit analysis; | |
220 | + | (2) A SUMMARY OF ANY PUBLICL Y AVAILABLE MINUTES , RECORDS, 18 | |
221 | + | OR DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED SERV ICE CHANGE; AND 19 | |
222 | 222 | ||
223 | - | (iii) A community outreach report; | |
223 | + | (3) A BRIEF STATEMENT EXPL AINING THE REASON FO R THE 20 | |
224 | + | PROPOSED SERVICE CHA NGE. 21 | |
224 | 225 | ||
225 | - | ( | |
226 | + | (d) (1) After completing the public hearings, the Administration shall: 22 | |
226 | 227 | ||
227 | - | (v) If applicable, the final alternative selected. | |
228 | + | (i) Publish the transit equity analysis and cost–benefit analysis on 23 | |
229 | + | the Administration’s website; and 24 | |
228 | 230 | ||
229 | - | (3) If a disparate impact or disproportionate burden exists in the final | |
230 | - | alternative selected, the report shall include a substantial justification statement. | |
231 | + | (ii) Compile a report on the impacts of the proposed service change. 25 | |
231 | 232 | ||
232 | - | ( | |
233 | + | (2) The report shall include: 26 | |
233 | 234 | ||
234 | - | (i) Made available to the public on the Administration’s website, | |
235 | - | with a visible link from the primary information page relating to the proposed service | |
236 | - | change; and Ch. 649 2024 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
235 | + | (i) The transit equity analysis; 27 | |
237 | 236 | ||
238 | - | – 6 | |
237 | + | (ii) The cost–benefit analysis; 28 6 HOUSE BILL 1507 | |
239 | 238 | ||
240 | - | (ii) Distributed to: | |
241 | 239 | ||
242 | - | 1. The members of the Board of Public Works; | |
243 | 240 | ||
244 | - | | |
241 | + | (iii) A community outreach report; 1 | |
245 | 242 | ||
246 | - | | |
243 | + | (iv) Any alternatives analyzed; and 2 | |
247 | 244 | ||
248 | - | 4. Any elected officials whose districts would be impacted by | |
249 | - | the proposed service change; | |
245 | + | (v) If applicable, the final alternative selected. 3 | |
250 | 246 | ||
251 | - | | |
252 | - | ||
247 | + | (3) If a disparate impact or disproportionate burden exists in the final 4 | |
248 | + | alternative selected, the report shall include a substantial justification statement. 5 | |
253 | 249 | ||
254 | - | 6. In accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government | |
255 | - | Article: | |
250 | + | (4) The report shall be: 6 | |
256 | 251 | ||
257 | - | A. The President of the Senate; | |
252 | + | (i) Made available to the public on the Administration’s website, 7 | |
253 | + | with a visible link from the primary information page relating to the proposed service 8 | |
254 | + | change; and 9 | |
258 | 255 | ||
259 | - | | |
256 | + | (ii) Distributed to: 10 | |
260 | 257 | ||
261 | - | | |
258 | + | 1. The members of the Board of Public Works; 11 | |
262 | 259 | ||
263 | - | D. The House Environment and Transportation Committee; | |
264 | - | AND | |
260 | + | 2. The Attorney General; 12 | |
265 | 261 | ||
266 | - | E. EACH MEMBER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHOSE | |
267 | - | DISTRICT WOULD BE IM PACTED BY THE PROPOS ED SERVICE CHANGE . | |
262 | + | 3. The Secretary of Transportation; 13 | |
268 | 263 | ||
269 | - | | |
270 | - | ||
264 | + | 4. Any elected officials whose districts would be impacted by 14 | |
265 | + | the proposed service change; 15 | |
271 | 266 | ||
272 | - | Approved by the Governor, May 9, 2024. | |
267 | + | 5. Any community leaders consulted during the community 16 | |
268 | + | outreach process; and 17 | |
269 | + | ||
270 | + | 6. In accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government 18 | |
271 | + | Article: 19 | |
272 | + | ||
273 | + | A. The President of the Senate; 20 | |
274 | + | ||
275 | + | B. The Speaker of the House; 21 | |
276 | + | ||
277 | + | C. The Senate Finance Committee; [and] 22 | |
278 | + | ||
279 | + | D. The House Environment and Transportation Committee; 23 | |
280 | + | AND 24 | |
281 | + | ||
282 | + | E. EACH MEMBER OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY WHOSE 25 | |
283 | + | DISTRICT WOULD BE IM PACTED BY THE PROPOS ED SERVICE CHANGE . 26 | |
284 | + | ||
285 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That t his Act shall take effect 27 | |
286 | + | October 1, 2024. 28 HOUSE BILL 1507 7 | |
287 | + | ||
288 | + | ||
289 | + | ||
290 | + | ||
291 | + | ||
292 | + | ||
293 | + | Approved: | |
294 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
295 | + | Governor. | |
296 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
297 | + | Speaker of the House of Delegates. | |
298 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
299 | + | President of the Senate. |