Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB330

Introduced
1/17/24  

Caption

Courts - Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation

Impact

The implementation of HB 330 is expected to positively impact state laws by providing a stronger framework for safeguarding free speech and encouraging civic engagement. By defining SLAPP suits more narrowly, the bill aims to deter frivolous litigation intended to silence critics or suppress public discourse. Additionally, it not only empowers defendants to seek dismissal of SLAPP claims expediently, but it also ensures that courts can award attorney's fees and costs to those prevailing against such suits. Overall, the bill seeks to strengthen protections for public participation in governmental and community issues.

Summary

House Bill 330 addresses the issue of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP suits) by redefining the conditions under which a lawsuit qualifies as a SLAPP suit. The bill seeks to protect individuals who exercise their rights to free speech and petition, particularly in matters of public concern. Specifically, it establishes clear criteria for what constitutes a SLAPP suit and outlines the legal protections afforded to defendants who publish statements related to their rights under the U.S. and Maryland constitutions. The proposal promotes the notion that individuals should be free to engage in public discourse without the fear of retaliatory lawsuits that may deter their participation.

Contention

Despite support for the bill from free speech advocates and organizations concerned with civic rights, there are areas of contention. Opponents may argue that the definitions and thresholds set by HB 330 could inadvertently shelter those who make false statements under the guise of public interest. Legal professionals may also argue that while the bill aims for justice, the legal standard for proving a SLAPP suit remains subjective and may lead to varied interpretations in court. Thus, striking a balance between protecting free speech and preventing defamation and misinformation from perpetuating could be a significant focus in the legislative discourse surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

MD SB568

Crossfiled Courts - Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation

MD HB129

Carry Over Courts - Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation

Similar Bills

MD HB950

Maryland Native Plants Program

MD SB836

Maryland Native Plants Program

MD HB161

Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority - Evaluation, Termination of Bond Authority, and Assumption of Functions, Employees, and Contracts (Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority Sunset Act)

MD HB1124

Maryland Department of Health - 2-1-1 Maryland, Maryland Think, and Maryland OneStop - Study

DE HCR156

Urging The State Of Maryland To Allow The Sale Of Certified Delaware Sod In Maryland.

MD SB14

Sustainable Maryland Program and Fund - Establishment

MD HB530

Maryland Trails Advisory Committee and the Maryland Office of Trails - Establishment (Great Maryland Trails Act)

MD SB645

Maryland Trails Advisory Committee and the Maryland Office of Trails - Establishment (Great Maryland Trails Act)