Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB147

Introduced
1/8/24  
Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/24  
Refer
1/8/25  
Report Pass
3/12/25  
Engrossed
3/13/25  
Refer
3/17/25  

Caption

County Boards of Education - Student Technology Use Policy - Requirements

Impact

The enactment of HB 147 will significantly alter the existing legislative framework surrounding school technology use in Maryland. It will require all county boards to establish clear parameters for technology use in educational settings, specifically restricting cellular devices unless particular criteria are met. This measure could lead to a standardization across the state, fostering a unified approach to student technology engagement and potentially impacting policies already in place in some districts.

Summary

House Bill 147 mandates that county boards of education develop and enact policies restricting elementary and middle school students' use of cellular phones and personal electronic devices during school hours. The bill aims to address concerns regarding distractions in educational settings and the impact of technology on student learning. While it allows for necessary exceptions, such as for health issues or educational purposes under the direction of educators, the overall intent is to promote a more focused learning environment in schools.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB 147 exhibit a mix of support and criticism. Proponents advocate for the bill as a means of enhancing student focus and learning outcomes by limiting distractions caused by personal electronic devices. Conversely, critics argue that stringent regulations could hinder the ability of students to access technology as learning tools, especially for those who rely on their devices for educational support. This division highlights an ongoing debate about the role of technology in education and its effects on teaching and learning processes.

Contention

While HB 147 provides a clear directive, it raises questions about the balance between regulation and educational freedom. Opponents warn that the bill could inadvertently disregard the needs of students who might benefit from using electronic devices for legitimate educational purposes. There are concerns that the mandatory policies could lead to an atmosphere of scrutiny and enforcement that may not be conducive to a supportive educational environment. The bill's implementation will need to consider the wide array of student needs and learning styles.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.