Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB197

Introduced
1/8/24  
Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/24  
Refer
1/8/25  
Report Pass
2/24/25  
Engrossed
2/28/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/31/25  

Caption

Public Schools - Restorative Practices Schools - Comprehensive Plan

Impact

If enacted, HB197 would have significant implications for how public schools in the state handle discipline and student behavior. The bill encourages a shift from punitive disciplinary measures towards more constructive approaches, emphasizing restorative practices that promote healing and improved school climate. It outlines the necessity for local boards to develop training programs for staff, thus ensuring that restorative practices become an integral part of the educational environment. Additionally, it highlights the importance of measuring outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of these initiatives in improving student behavior and school culture.

Summary

House Bill 197, titled 'Public Schools - Restorative Practices Schools - Comprehensive Plan', mandates the establishment of a framework for 'Restorative Practices Schools' across the state. The bill requires the State Department of Education to develop a comprehensive plan by July 1, 2026, which will guide local school systems in integrating restorative practices into their disciplinary approaches. This model aims to focus on relationship-building within school communities while providing methods for accountability and repair for harm caused by misconduct.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB197 appears to be supportive from advocates for educational reform and mental health initiatives, who believe that restorative practices can lead to better student outcomes and foster a positive school environment. However, there may also be concerns related to the implementation of these practices and whether they can adequately replace traditional disciplinary measures, particularly in schools dealing with severe behavioral issues. This reflects ongoing debates about the effectiveness and practicality of restorative approaches versus conventional discipline methods.

Contention

There are potential points of contention regarding the bill's implementation, particularly related to the need for adequate training and resources for educators. Some stakeholders may argue that without sufficient support, the transition to restorative practices could be challenging and economically burdensome for schools already operating with limited budgets. Furthermore, the bill’s requirement for comprehensive data reporting on student discipline and the performance metrics to be established raises questions about data privacy and the implications of public scrutiny on school performance metrics.

Companion Bills

MD SB68

Crossfiled Public Schools - Restorative Practices Schools - Comprehensive Plan

MD SB917

Carry Over Public Schools – Restorative Practices Schools – Establishment

Similar Bills

MI HB5233

Education: public school academies; certain authorizer and educational management organization information on school signage, advertising, and promotional materials; require. Amends sec. 1311e of 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.1311e).

AZ SB1434

Attorney discipline; jury trial

AZ SB1435

Attorney discipline investigations; costs

CA AB9

University of California: California State University: transfer students.

TX HB3307

Relating to the discipline of public school students.

MD HB488

Public Schools - Discipline-Related Data - Collection and Publication

MD SB714

Public Schools - Discipline-Related Data - Collection and Publication

MD SB277

Health Equality for Service Members Act