Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB861

Introduced
1/30/25  
Refer
1/30/25  
Report Pass
3/15/25  
Engrossed
3/17/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/4/25  

Caption

Transportation Network Companies - Weekly Fare and Earnings Summary and Operator Data Reporting

Impact

If passed, HB 861 would establish clear standards for financial reporting and data transparency within the transportation sector, particularly concerning TNCs. The bill sets forth annual reporting requirements to the Public Service Commission to include aggregated information such as average fares collected, total driving time, and earnings of operators. This systematic approach is expected to bolster regulatory oversight while providing valuable insights into operator performance and market dynamics within the TNC framework.

Summary

House Bill 861 is an act focused on the operational guidelines for transportation network companies (TNCs) within Maryland. It mandates TNCs to provide their operators and passengers with itemized digital receipts after transportation services are rendered. This requirement aims to enhance transparency and ensure operators are informed about their earnings in relation to the fees charged to passengers. Additionally, the bill requires TNCs to issue a weekly summary of fares and earnings to operators, emphasizing a structured reporting mechanism for earnings and operational data.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 861 appears largely supportive, with advocates emphasizing the need for enhanced transparency and fair treatment of operators in the TNC industry. Supporters argue that the bill will not only protect operators' rights by ensuring they receive detailed information about their earnings but will also benefit consumers by making pricing structures clearer. However, there are underlying concerns about how the confidentiality provisions regarding operator data might affect future regulatory adaptations and operator accountability.

Contention

While most commentary surrounding the bill is positive, some stakeholders express concerns about the potential administrative burdens that comprehensive reporting may place on TNCs. Critics suggest that smaller companies might struggle to absorb the costs associated with compliance. Additionally, the confidentiality of the data shared with regulatory bodies raises questions about the balance between privacy and transparency, with stakeholders debating how much information should be disclosed to the public versus kept confidential to protect business interests.

Companion Bills

MD SB1018

Crossfiled Transportation Network Companies - Itemized Receipts and Operator Data Reporting

Similar Bills

AZ SB1184

Transportation services employees; drivers; wages

UT SB0310

Transportation Utility Fee Amendments

TX HB2440

Relating to transportation network companies; imposing and authorizing fees; requiring an occupational permit; authorizing a civil penalty.

CA AB1343

Local alternative transportation improvement program: Feather River crossing.

TX HB1576

Relating to the delivery of certain transportation services under Medicaid and certain other health and human services programs.

NJ A3904

Requires geotechnical testing and certain monitoring of transportation projects.

NJ S2954

Requires geotechnical testing and certain monitoring of transportation projects.

TX SB1667

Relating to the delivery of certain transportation services under Medicaid and certain other health and human services programs.