Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB929

Introduced
1/31/25  
Refer
1/31/25  
Report Pass
3/3/25  
Engrossed
3/6/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Enrolled
4/2/25  
Chaptered
5/13/25  

Caption

Family Law - Permanent Protective Orders - Consent

Impact

If enacted, HB 929 would alter the landscape of abusive situations by enabling individuals who may have previously faced protective orders to consent to them formally. This change recognizes that not all situations of abuse result in straightforward victim-perpetrator dynamics, allowing for a more nuanced legal handling of these cases. Notably, this bill also stipulates that protective orders must be permanent unless specified otherwise by the victim, thereby enhancing the continuity of protective measures.

Summary

House Bill 929 aims to amend existing family law procedures regarding the issuance of permanent protective orders. It allows an individual to consent to the issuance of such orders against them, alongside existing criteria which include previous convictions of abuse and victim requests. The bill represents a significant shift in the approach to protective orders, acknowledging the individual's agency in the legal process while maintaining protections for victims of domestic abuse.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 929 appears to be mixed, with support primarily stemming from those advocating for more flexible legal frameworks in cases of domestic abuse. Proponents argue that the bill gives individuals more control over their situations and recognizes the complexities of personal relationships. However, there are concerns from advocacy groups that consent could be misused in situations where individuals may feel pressured, potentially undermining the protective intent of the law.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for abuses of the consent provision, where individuals may agree to protective orders under duress rather than freely. Critics emphasize the risk of undermining the protective nature of lethal domestic violence laws, arguing that consent should not be a means to circumvent necessary protective measures. As lawmakers consider the bill, the balance between victim protection and individual autonomy will be a central theme in ongoing discussions.

Companion Bills

MD SB721

Crossfiled Family Law - Permanent Protective Orders - Consent

Previously Filed As

MD HB745

Family Law - Protective Orders - Stalking and Permanent Protective Orders

MD SB743

Family Law - Protective Orders - Crimes of Violence and Stalking

MD HB1069

Protective Orders – Coercive Control

MD HB1290

Protective Orders - Coercive Control

MD SB383

Family Law - Maryland Child Abduction Prevention Act

MD HB267

Family Law - Maryland Child Abduction Prevention Act

MD HB824

Public Safety - Regulated Firearms - Possession and Permits to Carry, Wear, and Transport a Handgun

MD SB707

Armed Forces – Support of Military Families and Addition of Space Force

MD HB1026

Armed Forces - Support of Military Families and Addition of Space Force

MD HB14

Family Law - Grounds for Divorce

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.