Maine 2023-2024 Regular Session

Maine House Bill LD1866

Introduced
5/2/23  
Refer
5/2/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Engrossed
6/23/23  
Enrolled
6/23/23  

Caption

Resolve, to Establish the Commission to Study Fair, Equitable and Competitive Income Tax Policy for Maine's Families and Small Businesses

Impact

This bill impacts state laws by modifying existing tax brackets and implementing new ones, thus altering the taxation landscape for high-income individuals and families. With the introduction of the surcharge for incomes at or above the specified thresholds, LD1866 aims to redistribute wealth more effectively, allowing the state to fund programs that benefit lower-income and middle-class families. However, the measure has sparked debate on its long-term implications for the state's economy and the potential perception of Maine as a tax-unfriendly state by affluent residents.

Summary

LD1866 aims to reform the income tax system in Maine by establishing five new tax brackets for high-income earners and introducing a surcharge for those with incomes exceeding $1 million. The bill seeks to make the tax system fairer and more equitable by targeting higher income levels for additional taxation. The proposed changes include specific percentages of surcharge based on income levels, which are intended to bring in more revenue for state funding of critical services while addressing wealth inequality within the state.

Sentiment

Sentiment around LD1866 is mixed, with proponents advocating for the bill as a necessary step toward a fairer tax system that addresses economic disparities. They argue that the increase in tax burden on wealthier individuals reflects a moral responsibility to support the state’s fiscal needs and social services. Conversely, opponents express concern that the new tax brackets and surcharge may drive high-income earners away from Maine, potentially harming job creation and the broader economy. This dichotomy highlights ongoing tensions between progressive tax policy and maintaining a business-friendly environment.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the effectiveness of the proposed tax changes in achieving revenue goals without deterring investments and the political implications of increasing tax rates during a time of economic uncertainty. Critics fear that the surcharge, while aimed at high earners, might disproportionately affect small business owners who may not have stable cash flows. Additionally, there is concern regarding how these changes could lead to a future policy shift, creating a precedent for further increases in taxation as the state's fiscal needs evolve.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.