Maine 2025-2026 Regular Session

Maine House Bill LD742

Introduced
2/25/25  
Refer
2/25/25  
Refer
2/25/25  

Caption

An Act to Permit Telehealth Services Across State Lines Following Referral from a Primary Care Provider Based in the State

Impact

If enacted, LD742 would represent a significant shift in how telehealth services are offered in the state, likely increasing the number of available healthcare options for patients. This bill addresses the barriers patients face in accessing care by allowing them the flexibility to connect with healthcare professionals in other states, potentially leading to improved health outcomes. The legislation stipulates that patients must be referred by their primary care providers, which adds a layer of oversight and maintains some degree of contact quality between patients and care providers.

Summary

LD742 is a legislative document proposing to permit telehealth services to be provided across state lines, contingent upon a referral from a primary care provider licensed within the state. This bill aims to expand healthcare access in regions where patients might not have local specialists available, especially within rural contexts where resources are scarce. Under the proposed law, both in-state and out-of-state licensed healthcare providers can deliver telehealth services, provided that proper consent and referrals have been obtained, ensuring compliance with licensing requirements from their respective states of practice.

Sentiment

The sentiment around LD742 appears to be generally positive among proponents who emphasize the importance of expanding access to services and the flexibility that telehealth offers patients, particularly during times when in-person visits can be challenging. Supporters argue that the bill could eliminate some logistical barriers and ultimately benefit patient care. However, there may be concerns regarding the quality of care and the efficacy of remote consultations versus in-person interactions, especially regarding complex medical needs.

Contention

Some points of contention have emerged during discussions surrounding LD742. Critics express worry about the potential for lower-quality care when providers are not directly engaged with patients in a physical setting. There are concerns about whether telehealth can truly meet certain types of care needs, especially for comprehensive examinations. Additionally, ensuring that out-of-state providers adhere to state standards and regulations poses another layer of complexity that might arise from this legislative change.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A3699

Authorizes health care professionals to engage in the use of remote patient monitoring devices; requires health care insurance coverage by certain insurers for remote patient monitoring devices.

HI SB2669

Relating To Gender Affirming Care.

AL SB272

Health, telehealth and telemedicine further provided for, reg. by Bd. of Medical Examiners and Medical Licensure Commission, Secs. 34-24-700 to 34-24-707, inclusive, added; Secs. 34-24-500 to 34-24-508, inclusive, re practice of medicine across state lines, repealed.

ME LD1956

An Act to Amend the Laws Governing Optometrists

AL HB423

Health, telehealth and telemedicine further provided for, Secs. 34-24-700 to 34-24-707, inclusive, added; Secs. 34-24-500 to 34-24-508, inclusive, repealed.

NJ S3631

Permits certain out-of-State mental health practitioners to practice in-State.

CT SB00002

An Act Expanding Preschool And Mental And Behavioral Services For Children.

NJ S2090

Revises emergency care services referral standards for providers of telemedicine and telehealth.